Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36142140›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

omicsGAT: Graph Attention Network for Cancer Subtype Analyses.

Sudipto Baul, Khandakar Tanvir Ahmed, Joseph Filipek, Wei Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sudipto BaulDepartment of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA.
Khandakar Tanvir AhmedDepartment of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA.
Joseph FilipekDepartment of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA.
Wei ZhangDepartment of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3605-9373

Funding

NIDDK Network Coordinating UnitU24DK097771 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Shuibing Chen, Jeffrey S. Grethe · 2013 to 2026
$20.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS U24 DK097771NIH HHS DK097771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of high-throughput omics technologies is becoming increasingly popular in all facets of biomedical science. The mRNA sequencing (RNA-seq) method reports quantitative measures of more than tens of thousands of biological features. It provides a more comprehensive molecular perspective of studied cancer mechanisms compared to traditional approaches. Graph-based learning models have been proposed to learn important hidden representations from gene expression data and network structure to improve cancer outcome prediction, patient stratification, and cell clustering. However, these graph-based methods cannot rank the importance of the different neighbors for a particular sample in the downstream cancer subtype analyses. In this study, we introduce omicsGAT, a graph attention network (GAT) model to integrate graph-based learning with an attention mechanism for RNA-seq data analysis. The multi-head attention mechanism in omicsGAT can more effectively secure information of a particular sample by assigning different attention coefficients to its neighbors. Comprehensive experiments on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) breast cancer and bladder cancer bulk RNA-seq data and two single-cell RNA-seq datasets validate that (1) the proposed model can effectively integrate neighborhood information of a sample and learn an embedding vector to improve disease phenotype prediction, cancer patient stratification, and cell clustering of the sample and (2) the attention matrix generated from the multi-head attention coefficients provides more useful information compared to the sample correlation-based adjacency matrix. From the results, we can conclude that some neighbors play a more important role than others in cancer subtype analyses of a particular sample based on the attention coefficient.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsCluster AnalysisGenomeHumansRNA, MessengerRNA, Messengercancer outcome predictiongraph attention networkpatient stratificationsingle-cell RNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID36142140
PMCPMC9499656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.