Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36142138›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Exploring the Healthy Eye Microbiota Niche in a Multicenter Study.

Davide Borroni, Andreu Paytuví-Gallart, Walter Sanseverino, Carmen Gómez-Huertas, Paola Bonci, Vito Romano, Giuseppe Giannaccare, Miguel Rechichi, Alessandro Meduri, Giovanni William Oliverio and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Phenotypic characterization, molecular typing, and clonal relatedness within Staphylococcus isolates in healthy ocular conditions.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Fluoroquinolones and Biofilm: A Narrative Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Davide BorroniDepartment of Doctoral Studies, Riga Stradins University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0001-6952-5647
Andreu Paytuví-GallartSequentia Biotech SL, Carrer del Dr. Trueta, 179, 08005 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0958-6592
Walter SanseverinoSequentia Biotech SL, Carrer del Dr. Trueta, 179, 08005 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3324-5912
Carmen Gómez-HuertasDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, 18014 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9227-5017
Paola BonciOspedale Civile di Ravenna, Banca Delle Cornee Della Regione Emilia-Romagna, 48121 Ravenna, Italy.
Vito RomanoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Specialties and Public Health, 9297 University of Brescia, ASST Spedali Civili, 25100 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5148-7643
Giuseppe GiannaccareDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2617-0289
Miguel RechichiCentro Polispecialistico Mediterraneo, 88050 Sellia Marina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1016-2535
Alessandro MeduriBiomedical Science Department, Institute of Ophthalmology, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 98146 Messina, Italy.
Giovanni William OliverioBiomedical Science Department, Institute of Ophthalmology, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 98146 Messina, Italy.
Carlos Rocha-de-LossadaEyemetagenomics Ltd., 71-75, Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London WC2H 9JQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7464-2493
On Behalf Of Lucy Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aims to explore and characterize healthy eye microbiota.

methodsHealthy subjects older than 18 years were selected for this descriptive cross-sectional study. Samples were collected with an eSwab with 1 mL of Liquid Amies Medium (Copan Brescia, Italy). Following DNA extraction, libraries preparation, and amplification, PCR products were purified and end-repaired for barcode ligation. Libraries were pooled to a final concentration of 26 pM. Template preparation was performed with Ion Chef according to Ion 510, Ion 520, and Ion 530 Kit-Chef protocol. Sequencing of the amplicon libraries was carried out on a 520 or 530 chip using the Ion Torrent S5 system (Thermo Fisher; Waltham, MA, USA). Raw reads were analyzed with GAIA (v 2.02).

resultsHealthy eye microbiota is a low-diversity microbiome. The vast majority of the 137 analyzed samples were highly enriched with

conclusionWe identified nine different ECSTs. A better understanding of healthy eye microbiota has the potential to improve disease diagnosis and personalized regimens to promote health.

Indexed as

Health PromotionMicrobiotaCross-Sectional StudiesDNAHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNARNA, Ribosomal, 16S16eyehealthymetagenomicsmicrobiomeOSDI

Identifiers

PMID36142138
PMCPMC9499403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.