Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36141850›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

A Systematic Review of Recreational Nitrous Oxide Use: Implications for Policy, Service Delivery and Individuals.

Julaine Allan, Jacqui Cameron, Juliana Bruno

Open access · goldAbstract readCase ReportsSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A simple presumptive field test for nitrous oxide.Irish journal of medical science · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Julaine AllanSchool of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9299-5866
Jacqui CameronSchool of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1253-1282
Juliana BrunoSchool of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Charles Sturt University · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Wollongong · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNitrous oxide (N

methodsTo identify publications reporting the recreational use of N

resultsThe search retrieved 407 reports. Thirty-four were included in the final analysis, including sixteen case reports. The included studies were primarily concerned with raising awareness of the apparently increasing use and subsequently increasing harms of recreational N

conclusionThe review found three key areas that deserve further consideration including: (1) policy, (2) service delivery, and (3) harm associated with N

Indexed as

Anesthetics, DissociativeNitrous OxideAdolescentHumansPolicyPrevalenceQualitative ResearchAnesthetics, DissociativeNitrous Oxidedrug useharm reductionhealth risksN2Onangsnitrous oxidepsychological harmsubstance addictionsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36141850
PMCPMC9517250
OpenAlexW4295766557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.