ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022
The Renaissance of the Vaginal Hysterectomy-A Due Act.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transvaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation: Efficacy in treating pelvic prolapse and influence on patients' anxiety and depression.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- Investigating ethical considerations in the communication network of married women undergone hysterectomy: instrumentation of a questionnaire.BMC medical ethics · 2024Article
- Case report: Transvaginal single-port extraperitoneal laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical prolapse: A single-center case series.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For many years, vaginal and abdominal hysterectomies were part of the routine procedures in many departments. Both of them lost their priority due to the introduction of endoscopy and robotic surgery. The disappearing abdominal hysterectomy is certainly reasonable, but the decline of using vaginal hysterectomy seems not to be justified, and it is an optimal example of the recent emergence of the Natural Orifice Surgery discipline. A modified method for vaginal hysterectomy is presented in order to encourage gynecologists to reconsider vaginal hysterectomy as a valid method. This method is the outcome of critical analyses of different vaginal hysterectomy methods. It is simple, reasonable, only ten steps, easy to learn, perform and teach, and proven to be a shorter operation with minimal blood loss and reduced need for analgesics when compared to the traditional way. Endoscopy or robotic surgery is not available everywhere. Therefore, it is important that gynecologists in low-resource settings be familiar with this simple method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.