Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36141638›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Serious Games for Executive Functions Training for Adults with Intellectual Disability: Overview.

S Shapoval, Mercé Gimeno-Santos, Amaia Mendez Zorrilla, Begoña Garcia-Zapirain, Myriam Guerra-Balic, Sara Signo-Miguel, Olga Bruna-Rabassa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

S ShapovaleVIDA-Lab, Deusto University, Avda/Universidades 24, 48007 Bilbao, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3531-9316
Mercé Gimeno-SantosFaculty of Psychology, Education and Sport Sciences, Blanquerna, University Ramon Llull, C/Císter, 34, 08022 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8570-5867
Amaia Mendez ZorrillaeVIDA-Lab, Deusto University, Avda/Universidades 24, 48007 Bilbao, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0539-4753
Begoña Garcia-ZapiraineVIDA-Lab, Deusto University, Avda/Universidades 24, 48007 Bilbao, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9356-1186
Myriam Guerra-BalicFaculty of Psychology, Education and Sport Sciences, Blanquerna, University Ramon Llull, C/Císter, 34, 08022 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9197-3179
Sara Signo-MiguelFaculty of Psychology, Education and Sport Sciences, Blanquerna, University Ramon Llull, C/Císter, 34, 08022 Barcelona, Spain.
Olga Bruna-RabassaFaculty of Psychology, Education and Sport Sciences, Blanquerna, University Ramon Llull, C/Císter, 34, 08022 Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Throughout the history of medical and psychology practice, specialists have worked to improve the quality of treatment and rehabilitation, which has led to the emergence of concepts such as serious games. These tools focus on different areas of intervention procedures, one of which is to help people with intellectual disability (ID). Individuals with ID have problems with executive functions (EFs), which are related to adaptive functioning. Recent studies showed that serious games positively impact cognitive, social, and communication skills in people with ID. The purpose of this study is to analyze the solutions that have been found in EF training for adults with ID in recent years, evaluating them with a number of key parameters and identifying the features and possible problems in the further development of our system. (2) Methods: A review was conducted starting with 573 articles in English related to serious games and selected from studies that had been published since 2015. Finally, 10 were examined in detail as they focused on EFs in adults with ID. They were searched in seven major databases ("Association for Computing Machinery" (ACM), IEEE Xplore database, DBLP computer science bibliography, Google Scholar, PubMed, SCOPUS, and PsycInfo). (3) Results: It was determined that the most frequent EFs referred to in the studies analyzed were planning and decision-making, followed by working memory and social cognition, behavioral regulation, flexibility, and inhibition capacity. The basic approach to the creation of support systems was also analyzed in terms of technical and program execution. The trend results' analysis evidenced improvements in EFs, even though they were not significant. This comprehensive technique enabled the identification of the main features and aspects to be taken into account for further development of our system.

Indexed as

Executive FunctionIntellectual DisabilityAdultHumansInhibition, PsychologicalMemory, Short-Termadultscognitive functionsexecutive functionsgame trainingintellectual disabilitymobile appserious game

Identifiers

PMID36141638
PMCPMC9517401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.