Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36141618›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Carbon Footprint Research Based on Input-Output Model-A Global Scientometric Visualization Analysis.

Jingwei Han, Zhixiong Tan, Maozhi Chen, Liang Zhao, Ling Yang, Siying Chen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07171853 (The Carbon Footprint Study of Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Various Techniques of Colonic Polypectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07171853 completednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Carbon Footprint Study of Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Various Techniques of Colonic Polypectomy

TypeobservationalSponsorKing Chulalongkorn Memorial HospitalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled362ConditionsColonoscopy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jingwei HanSchool of Economics and Business Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China.
Zhixiong TanSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7728-6025
Maozhi ChenSchool of Economics and Business Administration, Chongqing University of Education, Chongqing 400067, China.
Liang ZhaoInstitute of Scientific Research and Development, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China.
Ling YangSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China.
Siying ChenSchool of Economics and Business Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reducing the effect of mankind's activities on the climate and improving adaptability to global warming have become urgent matters. The carbon footprint (CF), derived from the concept of ecological footprint, has been used to assess the threat of climate change in recent years. As a "top to bottom" method, input-output analysis (IOA) has become a universally applicable CF assessment tool for tracing the carbon footprint embodied in economic activities. A wide range of CF studies from the perspective of the IOA model have been presented and have made great progress. It is crucial to have a better understanding of what the relevant research focuses on in this field, yet so far a systematic synopsis of the literature is missing. The purpose of this paper is to explore the knowledge structure and frontier trends in respect of the IOA model applied to CF research using scientometric visualization analysis. The main findings of this paper are as follows. (1) Published articles show a two-stage increase in the period 2008 to 2021, and present a complex academic network of countries, authors, and institutions in this important domain. (2) The classic studies are mainly divided into three categories: literature reviews, database application introduction, and CF accounting in different scales. (3) The research hotspots and trends show that the research scales tend to be more microscopic and applications of models tend to be more detailed. In addition, supply-chain analysis and driver-factor analysis will probably become the main research directions in the future.

Indexed as

Carbon FootprintClimate ChangeCarbonPublicationsCarboncarbon footprintinput–output modelknowledge-mapping analysisvisual analysis

Identifiers

PMID36141618
PMCPMC9516983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.