Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36141581›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Can Communication Technologies Reduce Loneliness and Social Isolation in Older People? A Scoping Review of Reviews.

Nicola Döring, Melisa Conde, Karlheinz Brandenburg, Wolfgang Broll, Horst-Michael Gross, Stephan Werner, Alexander Raake

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicola DöringMedia Psychology and Media Design Group, Technische Universität Ilmenau, 98693 Ilmenau, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1299-4586
Melisa CondeMedia Psychology and Media Design Group, Technische Universität Ilmenau, 98693 Ilmenau, Germany.
Karlheinz BrandenburgElectronic Media Technology Group, Technische Universität Ilmenau, 98693 Ilmenau, Germany.
Wolfgang BrollVirtual Worlds and Digital Games Group, Technische Universität Ilmenau, 98693 Ilmenau, Germany.
Horst-Michael GrossNeuroinformatics and Cognitive Robotics Lab, Technische Universität Ilmenau, 98693 Ilmenau, Germany.
Stephan WernerElectronic Media Technology Group, Technische Universität Ilmenau, 98693 Ilmenau, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9038-9061
Alexander RaakeAudiovisual Technology Group, Technische Universität Ilmenau, 98693 Ilmenau, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9357-1763

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLoneliness and social isolation in older age are considered major public health concerns and research on technology-based solutions is growing rapidly. This scoping review of reviews aims to summarize the communication technologies (CTs) (review question RQ1), theoretical frameworks (RQ2), study designs (RQ3), and positive effects of technology use (RQ4) present in the research field.

methodsA comprehensive multi-disciplinary, multi-database literature search was conducted. Identified reviews were analyzed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) framework. A total of

resultsThe majority of the included reviews addressed general internet and computer use (82% each) (RQ1). Of the 28 reviews, only one (4%) worked with a theoretical framework (RQ2) and 26 (93%) covered primary studies with quantitative-experimental designs (RQ3). The positive effects of technology use were shown in 55% of the outcome measures for loneliness and 44% of the outcome measures for social isolation (RQ4).

conclusionWhile research reviews show that CTs can reduce loneliness and social isolation in older people, causal evidence is limited and insights on innovative technologies such as augmented reality systems are scarce.

Indexed as

LonelinessSocial IsolationAgedCommunicationHumansPublic HealthResearch DesignReview Literature as Topicinterventionsolder adultsresearch reviewssenior citizenssocial inclusionsocial wellbeingtechnology-mediated communication

Identifiers

PMID36141581
PMCPMC9517063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.