Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36141165›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Local-Forest Method for Superspreaders Identification in Online Social Networks.

Yajing Hao, Shaoting Tang, Longzhao Liu, Hongwei Zheng, Xin Wang, Zhiming Zheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yajing HaoSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Shaoting TangKey Laboratory of Mathematics, Informatics and Behavioral Semantics (LMIB), Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Longzhao LiuKey Laboratory of Mathematics, Informatics and Behavioral Semantics (LMIB), Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Hongwei ZhengBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Future Blockchain and Privacy Computing, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Xin WangKey Laboratory of Mathematics, Informatics and Behavioral Semantics (LMIB), Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Zhiming ZhengKey Laboratory of Mathematics, Informatics and Behavioral Semantics (LMIB), Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Beihang University · CNBeijing Computing Center · CNBinzhou Medical University · CNDalian University of Technology · CN

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2018AAA0101100National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFB2700304National Natural Science Foundation of China 11871004National Natural Science Foundation of China 11922102National Natural Science Foundation of China 62141605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying the most influential spreaders in online social networks plays a prominent role in affecting information dissemination and public opinions. Researchers propose many effective identification methods, such as k-shell. However, these methods are usually validated by simulating propagation models, such as epidemic-like models, which rarely consider the Push-Republish mechanism with attenuation characteristic, the unique and widely-existing spreading mechanism in online social media. To address this issue, we first adopt the Push-Republish (PR) model as the underlying spreading process to check the performance of identification methods. Then, we find that the performance of classical identification methods significantly decreases in the PR model compared to epidemic-like models, especially when identifying the top 10% of superspreaders. Furthermore, inspired by the local tree-like structure caused by the PR model, we propose a new identification method, namely the Local-Forest (LF) method, and conduct extensive experiments in four real large networks to evaluate it. Results highlight that the Local-Forest method has the best performance in accurately identifying superspreaders compared with the classical methods.

Indexed as

complex networkinfluential nodesonline social networkspreading

Identifiers

PMID36141165
PMCPMC9497625
OpenAlexW4295884682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.