ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Surface Defect Detection of Fresh-Cut Cauliflowers Based on Convolutional Neural Network with Transfer Learning.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cauli-Det: enhancing cauliflower disease detection with modified YOLOv8.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Advanced deep learning techniques for early disease prediction in cauliflower plants.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Maturity Grading and Identification ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A fresh-cut cauliflower surface defect detection and classification model based on a convolutional neural network with transfer learning is proposed to address the low efficiency of the traditional manual detection of fresh-cut cauliflower surface defects. Four thousand, seven hundred and ninety images of fresh-cut cauliflower were collected in four categories including healthy, diseased, browning, and mildewed. In this study, the pre-trained MobileNet model was fine-tuned to improve training speed and accuracy. The model optimization was achieved by selecting the optimal combination of training hyper-parameters and adjusting the different number of frozen layers; the parameters downloaded from ImageNet were optimally integrated with the parameters trained on our own model. A comparison of test results was presented by combining VGG19, InceptionV3, and NASNetMobile. Experimental results showed that the MobileNet model's loss value was 0.033, its accuracy was 99.27%, and the F1 score was 99.24% on the test set when the learning rate was set as 0.001, dropout was set as 0.5, and the frozen layer was set as 80. This model had better capability and stronger robustness and was more suitable for the surface defect detection of fresh-cut cauliflower when compared with other models, and the experiment's results demonstrated the method's feasibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.