Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36140905›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Microbial Indicators and Possible Focal Points of Contamination during Production and Processing of Catfish.

Angelica Abdallah-Ruiz, Lurdes Siberio Wood, Taejo Kim, Wes Schilling, Shecoya B White, Bang-Yuan Chen, Alba Durango-Villadiego, Juan L Silva

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Angelica Abdallah-RuizDepartment of Food Science, Nutrition, and Health Promotion, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8704-0985
Lurdes Siberio WoodDepartment of Food Science, Nutrition, and Health Promotion, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA.
Taejo KimDepartment of Kinesiology, Health, Food and Nutrition Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Stout, Menomonie, WI 54751, USA.
Wes SchillingDepartment of Food Science, Nutrition, and Health Promotion, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA.
Shecoya B WhiteDepartment of Food Science, Nutrition, and Health Promotion, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA.
Bang-Yuan ChenDepartment of Food Science, Fu Jen Catholic University, 510 Zhongzheng Road, New Taipei City 242, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-6708-7257
Alba Durango-VilladiegoDepartment of Food Engineering, University of Córdoba, Montería 230002, Córdoba, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-6463-3478
Juan L SilvaDepartment of Food Science, Nutrition, and Health Promotion, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5624-9599
Mississippi State University · USFu Jen Catholic University · TWUniversity of Córdoba · COUniversity of Wisconsin–Stout · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The catfish industry is important to the United States economy. The present study determined the levels of microbial indicators and the prevalence of Listeria spp. and Listeria monocytogenes at catfish farms and catfish processing plants. Live fish, water, and sediment samples were analyzed in farms. Fish skin, fillets, chiller water, and environmental surfaces were assessed at the processing plants both during operation and after sanitation. Live fish had 2% prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes, while sediment and water were negative for Listeria. Live fish skin counts averaged 4.2, 1.9, and 1.3 log CFU/cm2 aerobic (APC), total coliform (TCC) and generic Escherichia coli counts, respectively. Water and sediment samples averaged 4.8 and 5.8 log CFU/g APC, 1.9 and 2.3 log CFU/g TCC, and 1.0 and 1.6 log CFU/g generic E. coli counts, respectively. During operation, Listeria prevalence was higher in fillets before (57%) and after (97%) chilling than on fish skin (10%). Process chiller water had higher (p ≤ 0.05) APC, TCC, and Listeria prevalence than clean chiller water. After sanitation, most sampling points in which Listeria spp. were present had high levels of APC (>2.4 log CFU/100 cm2). APC combined with Listeria spp. could be a good approach to understand microbial contamination in catfish plants.

Indexed as

catfishListeria monocytogenesListeria spp.microbial indicators

Identifiers

PMID36140905
PMCPMC9497987
OpenAlexW4295884659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.