Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36140842›Full record

ArticleGenes2022

Survival Analysis with High-Dimensional Omics Data Using a Threshold Gradient Descent Regularization-Based Neural Network Approach.

Yu Fan, Sanguo Zhang, Shuangge Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yu FanSchool of Mathematics Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Sanguo ZhangSchool of Mathematics Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
Shuangge MaDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.

Funding

Novel methods for identifying genetic interactions in cancer prognosisR01CA204120 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Shuangge Ma · 2016 to 2026
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis of data with a censored survival response and high-dimensional omics measurements is now common. Most of the existing analyses are based on specific (semi)parametric models, in particular the Cox model. Such analyses may be limited by not having sufficient flexibility, for example, in accommodating nonlinearity. For categorical and continuous responses, neural networks (NNs) have provided a highly competitive alternative. Comparatively, NNs for censored survival data remain limited. Omics measurements are usually high-dimensional, and only a small subset is expected to be survival-associated. As such, regularized estimation and selection are needed. In the existing NN studies, this is usually achieved via penalization. In this article, we propose adopting the threshold gradient descent regularization (TGDR) technique, which has competitive performance (for example, when compared to penalization) and unique advantages in regression analysis, but has not been adopted with NNs. The TGDR-based NN has a highly sensible formulation and an architecture different from the unregularized and penalization-based ones. Simulations show its satisfactory performance. Its practical effectiveness is further established via the analysis of two cancer omics datasets. Overall, this study can provide a practical and useful new way in the NN paradigm for survival analysis with high-dimensional omics measurements.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsNeural Networks, ComputerProportional Hazards ModelsRegression AnalysisSurvival Analysishigh-dimensional omics dataneural networksurvival analysisTGDR

Identifiers

PMID36140842
PMCPMC9498566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.