ArticleGenes2022
Simultaneous SARS-CoV-2 Genome Sequencing of 384 Samples on an Illumina MiSeq Instrument through Protocol Optimization.
Article in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Short-Read and Long-Read Whole Genome Sequencing for SARS-CoV-2 Variants Identification.Viruses · 2025Article
- Analytical Performance of a Novel Nanopore Sequencing for SARS-CoV-2 Genomic Surveillance.Journal of medical virology · 2024Article
- Survey of bed bug infestations in homeless shelters in southern France.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the present study, we propose a high-throughput sequencing protocol using aNextera XT Library DNA kit on an Illumina MiSeq instrument. We made major modifications to this library preparation in order to multiplex 384 samples in a single Illumina flow cell. To validate our protocol, we compared the sequences obtained with the modified Illumina protocol to those obtained with the GridION Nanopore protocol. For the modified Illumina protocol, our results showed that 94.9% (357/376) of the sequences were interpretable, with a viral genome coverage between 50.5% and 99.9% and an average depth of 421×. For the GridION Nanopore protocol, 94.6% (356/376) of the sequences were interpretable, with a viral genome coverage between 7.0% and 98.6% and an average depth of 2123×. The modified Illumina protocol allows for gaining EUR 4744 and returning results of 384 samples in 53.5 h versus four times 55.5 h with the standard Illumina protocol. Our modified MiSeq protocol yields similar genome sequence data as the GridION Nanopore protocol and has the advantage of being able to handle four times more samples simultaneously and hence is much less expensive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.