ReviewGenes2022
Whole-Genome Sequencing and Comparative Genomics Analysis of the Wild Edible Mushroom (
Review in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mating-Type System Analysis and Domestication ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Metabolomic insights into the impact of drying methods on flavor and nutrient retention inFood chemistry: X · 2026Article
- A Review of Genomic, Transcriptomic, and Proteomic Applications in Edible Fungi Biology: Current Status and Future Directions.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Whole-Genome Sequencing and Fine Map Analysis ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Whole-Genome Sequence Analysis ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Chromosome-Level Assembly and Comparative Genomic Analysis ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Whole Genome Sequence of an Edible MushroomJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Deciphering the roles of unknown/uncharacterized genes in plant development and stress responses.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.