ArticleGenes2022
Estimation of Complex-Trait Prediction Accuracy from the Different Holo-Omics Interaction Models.
Article in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of reducing metagenomic sequencing depth on phenotypic prediction accuracy of feed intake and average daily gain in beef cattle.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- Exploring the Interplay between the Hologenome and Complex Traits in Bovine and Porcine Animals Using Genome-Wide Association Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Holo-omics analysis reveals the influence of gut microbiota on obesity indicators in Jinhua pigs.BMC microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Statistical models play a significant role in designing competent breeding programs related to complex traits. Recently; the holo-omics framework has been productively utilized in trait prediction; but it contains many complexities. Therefore; it is desirable to establish prediction accuracy while combining the host's genome and microbiome data. Several methods can be used to combine the two data in the model and study their effectiveness by estimating the prediction accuracy. We validate our holo-omics interaction models with analysis from two publicly available datasets and compare them with genomic and microbiome prediction models. We illustrate that the holo-omics interactive models achieved the highest prediction accuracy in ten out of eleven traits. In particular; the holo-omics interaction matrix estimated using the Hadamard product displayed the highest accuracy in nine out of eleven traits, with the direct holo-omics model and microbiome model showing the highest prediction accuracy in the remaining two traits. We conclude that comparing prediction accuracy in different traits using real data showed important intuitions into the holo-omics architecture of complex traits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.