Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36140725›Full record

ArticleGenes2022

Application of Feature Selection and Deep Learning for Cancer Prediction Using DNA Methylation Markers.

Rahul Gomes, Nijhum Paul, Nichol He, Aaron Francis Huber, Rick J Jansen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Methods in DNA methylation array dataset analysis: A review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rahul GomesDepartment of Computer Science, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, 133 Phillips Science Hall, 101 Roosevelt Ave, Eau Claire, WI 54701, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5377-8196
Nijhum PaulDepartment of Public Health, North Dakota State University, 640S Aldevron Tower, 1455 14th Ave N, Fargo, ND 58102, USA.
Nichol HeDepartment of Computer Science, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, 133 Phillips Science Hall, 101 Roosevelt Ave, Eau Claire, WI 54701, USA.
Aaron Francis HuberDepartment of Computer Science, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, 133 Phillips Science Hall, 101 Roosevelt Ave, Eau Claire, WI 54701, USA.
Rick J JansenDepartment of Public Health, North Dakota State University, 640S Aldevron Tower, 1455 14th Ave N, Fargo, ND 58102, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5683-2584
University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire · USAldevron (United States) · US

Funding

Targeting CLEC-2/podoplanin as a therapeutic strategy for pancreatic cancerP20GM109024 · NIGMS · NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Megan Orr · 2016 to 2026
$20.5M
NIH HHS P20GM109024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA methylation is a process that can affect gene accessibility and therefore gene expression. In this study, a machine learning pipeline is proposed for the prediction of breast cancer and the identification of significant genes that contribute to the prediction. The current study utilized breast cancer methylation data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), specifically the TCGA-BRCA dataset. Feature engineering techniques have been utilized to reduce data volume and make deep learning scalable. A comparative analysis of the proposed approach on Illumina 27K and 450K methylation data reveals that deep learning methodologies for cancer prediction can be coupled with feature selection models to enhance prediction accuracy. Prediction using 450K methylation markers can be accomplished in less than 13 s with an accuracy of 98.75%. Of the list of 685 genes in the feature selected 27K dataset, 578 were mapped to Ensemble Gene IDs. This reduced set was significantly (FDR < 0.05) enriched in five biological processes and one molecular function. Of the list of 1572 genes in the feature selected 450K data set, 1290 were mapped to Ensemble Gene IDs. This reduced set was significantly (FDR < 0.05) enriched in 95 biological processes and 17 molecular functions. Seven oncogene/tumor suppressor genes were common between the 27K and 450K feature selected gene sets. These genes were RTN4IP1, MYO18B, ANP32A, BRF1, SETBP1, NTRK1, and IGF2R. Our bioinformatics deep learning workflow, incorporating imputation and data balancing methods, is able to identify important methylation markers related to functionally important genes in breast cancer with high accuracy compared to deep learning or statistical models alone.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningTATA-Binding Protein Associated FactorsCarrier ProteinsDNA MethylationFemaleGenetic MarkersHumansMachine LearningMitochondrial ProteinsNuclear ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsANP32A protein, humanBRF1 protein, humanCarrier ProteinsGenetic MarkersMitochondrial ProteinsNuclear ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsRTN4IP1 protein, humanTATA-Binding Protein Associated Factorsbreast cancerdeep learningDNA methylationTCGA

Identifiers

PMID36140725
PMCPMC9498757
OpenAlexW4293528028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.