ArticleGenes2022
Application of Feature Selection and Deep Learning for Cancer Prediction Using DNA Methylation Markers.
Article in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of deep learning in cancer epigenetics through DNA methylation analysis.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence Design for Race-Based Prostate Cancer Stage Classification With Multilayer Perceptron: Feature Selection Optimization Approach.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-powered liquid biopsy in cancer: a paradigm shift in cancer detection and personalized care.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- Νovel methylation biomarkers in liquid biopsy and classifying biosignatures for the clinical management of breast cancer.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Article
- Pathway information on methylation analysis using deep neural network (PROMINENT): An interpretable deep learning method with pathway prior for phenotype prediction using gene-level DNA methylation.Artificial intelligence in medicine · 2025Article
- Framework for Race-Specific Prostate Cancer Detection Using Machine Learning Through Gene Expression Data: Feature Selection Optimization Approach.JMIR bioinformatics and biotechnology · 2025Article
- UNet with Attention Networks: A Novel Deep Learning Approach for DNA Methylation Prediction in HeLa Cells.Genes · 2025Article
- DNA methylation in breast cancer: early detection and biomarker discovery through current and emerging approaches.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Methods in DNA methylation array dataset analysis: A review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Survival Rate and Chronic Diseases of TCGA Cancer and KoGES Normal Samples by Clustering for DNA Methylation.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Transformer Architecture and Attention Mechanisms in Genome Data Analysis: A Comprehensive Review.Biology · 2023Review
- Application of Deep Learning to IVC Filter Detection from CT Scans.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
DNA methylation is a process that can affect gene accessibility and therefore gene expression. In this study, a machine learning pipeline is proposed for the prediction of breast cancer and the identification of significant genes that contribute to the prediction. The current study utilized breast cancer methylation data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), specifically the TCGA-BRCA dataset. Feature engineering techniques have been utilized to reduce data volume and make deep learning scalable. A comparative analysis of the proposed approach on Illumina 27K and 450K methylation data reveals that deep learning methodologies for cancer prediction can be coupled with feature selection models to enhance prediction accuracy. Prediction using 450K methylation markers can be accomplished in less than 13 s with an accuracy of 98.75%. Of the list of 685 genes in the feature selected 27K dataset, 578 were mapped to Ensemble Gene IDs. This reduced set was significantly (FDR < 0.05) enriched in five biological processes and one molecular function. Of the list of 1572 genes in the feature selected 450K data set, 1290 were mapped to Ensemble Gene IDs. This reduced set was significantly (FDR < 0.05) enriched in 95 biological processes and 17 molecular functions. Seven oncogene/tumor suppressor genes were common between the 27K and 450K feature selected gene sets. These genes were RTN4IP1, MYO18B, ANP32A, BRF1, SETBP1, NTRK1, and IGF2R. Our bioinformatics deep learning workflow, incorporating imputation and data balancing methods, is able to identify important methylation markers related to functionally important genes in breast cancer with high accuracy compared to deep learning or statistical models alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.