Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36140713›Full record

ArticleGenes2022

In-Silico Characterization of Estrogen Reactivating β-Glucuronidase Enzyme in GIT Associated Microbiota of Normal Human and Breast Cancer Patients.

Fatima Muccee, Shakira Ghazanfar, Wajya Ajmal, Majid Al-Zahrani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Characterization ofInternational journal of microbiology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fatima MucceeSchool of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Punjab, Lahore 52254, Pakistan.
Shakira GhazanfarNational Institute for Genomics Advanced Biotechnology (NIGAB), National Agricultural Research Centre (NARC), Islamabad 45500, Pakistan.
Wajya AjmalNational Institute for Genomics Advanced Biotechnology (NIGAB), National Agricultural Research Centre (NARC), Islamabad 45500, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-4630-8583
Majid Al-ZahraniBiological Science Department, College of Science and Art, King Abdulaziz University, Rabigh 25724, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0781-0121
King Abdulaziz University · SAUniversity of the Punjab · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estrogen circulating in blood has been proved to be a strong biomarker for breast cancer. A β-glucuronidase enzyme (GUS) from human gastrointestinal tract (GIT) microbiota including probiotics has significant involvement in enhancing the estrogen concentration in blood through deconjugation of glucuronidated estrogens. The present project has been designed to explore GIT microbiome-encoded GUS enzymes (GUSOME) repertoire in normal human and breast cancer patients. For this purpose, a total of nineteen GUS enzymes from human GIT microbes, i.e., seven from healthy and twelve from breast cancer patients have been focused on. Protein sequences of enzymes retrieved from UniProt database were subjected to ProtParam, CELLO2GO, SOPMA (secondary structure prediction method), PDBsum (Protein Database summaries), PHYRE2 (Protein Homology/AnalogY Recognition Engine), SAVES v6.0 (Structure Validation Server), MEME version 5.4.1 (Multiple Em for Motif Elicitation), Caver Web server v 1.1, Interproscan and Predicted Antigenic Peptides tool. Analysis revealed the number of amino acids, isoelectric point, extinction coefficient, instability index and aliphatic index of GUS enzymes in the range of 586−795, 4.91−8.92, 89,980−155,075, 25.88−40.93 and 71.01−88.10, respectively. Sub-cellular localization of enzyme was restricted to cytoplasm and inner-membrane in case of breast cancer patients’ bacteria as compared to periplasmic space, outer membrane and extracellular space in normal GIT bacteria. The 2-D structure analysis showed α helix, extended strand, β turn and random coil in the range of 27.42−22.66%, 22.04−25.91%, 5.39−8.30% and 41.75−47.70%, respectively. The druggability score was found to be 0.05−0.45 and 0.06−0.80 in normal and breast cancer patients GIT, respectively. The radius, length and curvature of catalytic sites were observed to be 1.1−2.8 Å, 1.4−15.9 Å and 0.65−1.4, respectively. Ten conserved protein motifs with p < 0.05 and width 25−50 were found. Antigenic propensity-associated sequences were 20−29. Present study findings hint about the use of the bacterial GUS enzymes against breast cancer tumors after modifications via site-directed mutagenesis of catalytic sites involved in the activation of estrogens and through destabilization of these enzymes.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMicrobiotaAmino AcidsBacteriaBiomarkersEstrogensFemaleGastrointestinal TractGlucuronidaseHumansAmino AcidsBiomarkersEstrogensGlucuronidasebreast cancerdeconjugationestrogenLactobacillusprobioticsreactivation

Identifiers

PMID36140713
PMCPMC9498756
OpenAlexW4293531189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.