Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36140696›Full record

ArticleGenes2022

mintRULS: Prediction of miRNA-mRNA Target Site Interactions Using Regularized Least Square Method.

Sushil Shakyawar, Siddesh Southekal, Chittibabu Guda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. MicroRNAs in Tissue Regeneration: Lessons from Animal Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Advances in applications of artificial intelligence algorithms for cancer-related miRNA research.Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2024
    Review
  6. Bioinformatics advances · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sushil ShakyawarDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.
Siddesh SouthekalDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1865-9263
Chittibabu GudaDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5393-9316

Funding

UNMC Structural Biology CoreP20GM103427 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI Heather Colleen Jensen-Smith · 2012 to 2026
$59.2M
UNMC/EPPLEY CANCER CENTER SUPPORT GRANTP30CA036727 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI James Eudy · 1985 to 2026
$55.0M
Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM115458 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZHANG, YING · 2016 to 2025
$42.8M
Therapeutics Core (Page 286)P30MH062261 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI FOX, HOWARD S · 2000 to 2021
$37.7M
The Aging Pituitary/Gonadal AxisP01AG029531 · NIA · WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GEORGE R BOUSFIELD · 2009 to 2026
$25.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA036727NIA NIH HHS P01 AG029531NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103427NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM115458NIH HHS 2P01AG029531NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH062261
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of miRNA-mRNA interactions is critical to understand the new paradigms in gene regulation. Existing methods show suboptimal performance owing to inappropriate feature selection and limited integration of intuitive biological features of both miRNAs and mRNAs. The present regularized least square-based method, mintRULS, employs features of miRNAs and their target sites using pairwise similarity metrics based on free energy, sequence and repeat identities, and target site accessibility to predict miRNA-target site interactions. We hypothesized that miRNAs sharing similar structural and functional features are more likely to target the same mRNA, and conversely, mRNAs with similar features can be targeted by the same miRNA. Our prediction model achieved an impressive AUC of 0.93 and 0.92 in LOOCV and LmiTOCV settings, respectively. In comparison, other popular tools such as miRDB, TargetScan, MBSTAR, RPmirDIP, and STarMir scored AUCs at 0.73, 0.77, 0.55, 0.84, and 0.67, respectively, in LOOCV setting. Similarly, mintRULS outperformed other methods using metrics such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and MCC. Our method also demonstrated high accuracy when validated against experimentally derived data from condition- and cell-specific studies and expression studies of miRNAs and target genes, both in human and mouse.

Indexed as

MicroRNAsAnimalsGene Expression RegulationHumansLeast-Squares AnalysisMiceRNA, MessengerMicroRNAsRNA, Messengerleast square regressionmiRNA–target site interactionnucleotide sequence featurepairwise feature scoring

Identifiers

PMID36140696
PMCPMC9498445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.