ReviewGenes2022
Next Generation Sequencing after Invasive Prenatal Testing in Fetuses with Congenital Malformations: Prenatal or Neonatal Investigation.
Review in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Whole Genome Sequencing in Prenatal Diagnostics: The Danish Approach to Guideline Formation and Implementation Within Public Healthcare.Prenatal diagnosis · 2026Article
- Decoding structural birth defects through genomic landscapes: Innovative frameworks for diagnosis (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Detection of chromosomal and gene abnormality with karyotyping, chromosomal microarray analysis and trio-based whole exome sequencing in pregnancies with fetal growth restriction: implications for precise prenatal diagnosis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Application of trio-based whole-exome sequencing in fetal ultrasound anomalies: a single-center retrospective study of 454 cases.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Fetal gene therapy.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2024Review
- Prenatal whole-exome sequencing in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2023Article
- Access to prenatal exome sequencing for fetal malformations: A qualitative landscape analysis in the US.Prenatal diagnosis · 2023Article
- 'Compressed Baby Head': A New 'Abusive Head Trauma' Entity?Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Prenatal Detection of aGenes · 2023Article
- Assessing the Ethical Considerations in the Era of Advanced Prenatal Testing and Genetic Counselling - Clinicians' Perspective.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social MedicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital malformations diagnosed by ultrasound screening complicate 3-5% of pregnancies and many of these have an underlying genetic cause. Approximately 40% of prenatally diagnosed fetal malformations are associated with aneuploidy or copy number variants, detected by conventional karyotyping, QF-PCR and microarray techniques, however monogenic disorders are not diagnosed by these tests. Next generation sequencing as a secondary prenatal genetic test offers additional diagnostic yield for congenital abnormalities deemed to be potentially associated with an underlying genetic aetiology, as demonstrated by two large cohorts: the 'Prenatal assessment of genomes and exomes' (PAGE) study and 'Whole-exome sequencing in the evaluation of fetal structural anomalies: a prospective cohort study' performed at Columbia University in the US. These were large and prospective studies but relatively 'unselected' congenital malformations, with little Clinical Genetics input to the pre-test selection process. This review focuses on the incremental yield of next generation sequencing in single system congenital malformations, using evidence from the PAGE, Columbia and subsequent cohorts, with particularly high yields in those fetuses with cardiac and neurological anomalies, large nuchal translucency and non-immune fetal hydrops (of unknown aetiology). The total additional yield gained by exome sequencing in congenital heart disease was 12.7%, for neurological malformations 13.8%, 13.1% in increased nuchal translucency and 29% in non-immune fetal hydrops. This demonstrates significant incremental yield with exome sequencing in single-system anomalies and supports next generation sequencing as a secondary genetic test in routine clinical care of fetuses with congenital abnormalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.