Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36140644›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Low-Milliampere CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Percutaneous Drainage Placement after Pancreatic Surgery: Technical and Clinical Outcome in 133 Consecutive Patients during a 14-Year Period.

Christoph G Trumm, Danilo Hackner, Katharina Badmann, Alexander Crispin, Robert Forbrig, Yigit Ozpeynirci, David Kuppinger, Vera Pedersen, Thomas Liebig, Robert Stahl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christoph G TrummInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1249-3338
Danilo HacknerDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University (FAU) Erlangen-Nuremberg, Krankenhausstr. 12, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3161-5094
Katharina BadmannDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Alexander CrispinIBE-Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Robert ForbrigInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Yigit OzpeynirciInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
David KuppingerDepartment of General, Visceral, Transplantation, and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Vera PedersenDepartment of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0542-5684
Thomas LiebigInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Robert StahlInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2788-9316
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEZimmer Biomet (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Purpose: To retrospectively assess the technical and clinical outcome of patients with symptomatic postoperative fluid collections after pancreatic surgery, treated with CT-guided drainage (CTD). (2) Methods: 133 eligible patients between 2004 and 2017 were included. We defined technical success as the sufficient drainage of the fluid collection(s) and the absence of peri-interventional complications (minor or major according to SIR criteria). Per definition, clinical success was characterized by normalization of specific blood parameters within 30 days after the intervention or a decrease by at least 50% without requiring additional surgical revision. C-reactive protein (CRP), Leukocytes, Interleukin-6, and Dose length product (DLP) for parts of the intervention were determined. (3) Results: 97.0% of 167 interventions were technically successful. Clinical success was achieved in 87.5% of CRP, in 78.4% of Leukocytes, and in 87.5% of Interleukin-6 assessments. The median of successful decrease was 6 days for CRP, 5 days for Leukocytes, and 2 days for Interleukin-6. No surgical revision was necessary in 93.2%. DLP was significantly lower in the second half of the observation period (total DLP: median 621.5 mGy*cm between 2011-2017 vs. median 944.5 mGy*cm between 2004-2010). (4) Conclusions: Technical success rate of CTD was very high and the clinical success rate was fair to good. Given an elderly and multimorbid patient cohort, CTD can have a temporizing effect in the postoperative period after pancreatic surgery. Reducing the radiation dose over time might reflect developments in CT technology and increased experience of interventional radiologists.

Indexed as

clinical outcomeCT-guided drainagefluid collectionpancreatic resectiontechnical outcome

Identifiers

PMID36140644
PMCPMC9498101
OpenAlexW4296352168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.