Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36140610›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Clinical Utility of the Contrast-Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cyst.

Miruna Patricia Olar, Sorana D Bolboacă, Cristina Pojoga, Ofelia Moșteanu, Marcel Gheorghiu, Radu Seicean, Ioana Rusu, Zeno Sparchez, Nadim Al Hajjar, Andrada Seicean

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Endoscopic management of pancreatic cystic neoplasms.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025
    Review
  4. Contrast-enhanced guided endoscopic ultrasound procedures.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Miruna Patricia OlarDepartment of Gastroenterology, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Croitorilor Str., no. 19-21, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Sorana D BolboacăDepartment of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Louis Pasteur Str., no. 6, 400349 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-2342-4311
Cristina PojogaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Croitorilor Str., no. 19-21, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Ofelia MoșteanuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Croitorilor Str., no. 19-21, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Marcel GheorghiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Croitorilor Str., no. 19-21, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-1886-8791
Radu SeiceanFirst Department of Surgery, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Clinicilor Str., no. 3-5, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Ioana RusuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Croitorilor Str., no. 19-21, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Zeno SparchezDepartment of Gastroenterology, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Croitorilor Str., no. 19-21, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Nadim Al HajjarRegional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Croitorilor Str., no. 19-21, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Andrada SeiceanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Croitorilor Str., no. 19-21, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5809-1334
Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) cytology from an intracystic fluid is useful in the differentiation of pancreatic cysts, with low sensitivity, which increases when the solid component is targeted. The clinical utility of contrast-enhanced guided EUS-FNA (CH-EUS-FNA) in the solid component is not known. We aimed to assess the diagnostic value of CH-EUS-FNA in enhanced mural nodules and discrimination between different cysts using contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS). The prospective study recruited patients with pancreatic cysts with an unclear diagnosis. The CH-EUS was followed by CH-EUS-FNA. The final diagnosis was based on surgery or the correlation between clinical history, cross-sectional imaging, echoendoscopic morphology, cystic fluid analysis, and follow-up. Fifty-eight patients with pancreatic cysts were evaluated. The mucinous cysts had wall arterial enhancement more often than non- mucinous cysts (p < 0.0001), with 90.2% sensitivity and 70.6% specificity. The CH-EUS-FNA from cystic fluid and mural nodules identified mucinous cysts and malignancy with 82.4% and 84.2% sensitivity and 92% and 100% specificity. Twenty-one cysts had solid components, but only 13 were enhanced mural nodules on EUS assessment with conclusive cytology in all cases and malignancy in 76.9%. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound should be completed in all PCN with solid components in order to avoid unnecessary EUS-FNA and to guide FNA for the identification of malignant cysts.

Indexed as

CH-EUS (contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound)endoscopic ultrasoundEUS-FNA (endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration)mural nodulepancreatic cyst

Identifiers

PMID36140610
PMCPMC9497576
OpenAlexW4295591988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.