ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Current Status of
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating the diagnostic utility of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-Pentixafor in solid tumors: a systematic review.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of [Molecular imaging and biology · 2024Trial
- Selective CXCR4-Targeting Radioconjugates Derived from LY2510924: Evaluation of [Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Progress in the application of 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT in lung cancer: a review.Oncology reviews · 2026Review
- Opportunities in Cancer Therapies: Deciphering the Role of Cancer Stem Cells in Tumour Repopulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Comparative Evaluation of Response in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma UsingIndian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, IndiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chemokine receptor CXCR4 is overexpressed in neoplasms and its expression is related to tumour invasion, metastasis and aggressiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.