Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36140532›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Neuromuscular Stability of Dental Occlusion in Patients Treated with Aligners and Fixed Orthodontic Appliance: A Preliminary Electromyographical Longitudinal Case-Control Study.

Claudia Paola Bruna Dellavia, Giacomo Begnoni, Cristiana Zerosi, Guia Guenza, Natalie Khomchyna, Riccardo Rosati, Federica Musto, Gaia Pellegrini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Fixed orthodontic appliances and clear aligner system: a comparative review].Revista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur)
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Claudia Paola Bruna DellaviaDepartment of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Via Luigi Mangiagalli 31, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5145-3606
Giacomo BegnoniDepartment of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Via Luigi Mangiagalli 31, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1292-3745
Cristiana ZerosiDepartment of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Via Luigi Mangiagalli 31, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Guia GuenzaDepartment of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Via Luigi Mangiagalli 31, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Natalie KhomchynaDepartment of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Via Luigi Mangiagalli 31, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Riccardo RosatiDepartment of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Via Luigi Mangiagalli 31, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6149-0427
Federica MustoDepartment of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Via Luigi Mangiagalli 31, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Gaia PellegriniDepartment of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Via Luigi Mangiagalli 31, 20133 Milan, Italy.
University of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate if, after treatment with aligners (ALIGN) and fixed orthodontic appliance (FOA), alterations of the neuromuscular activity may occur and if differences in these changes can be detected between the two treatments. Sixteen healthy patients (7 FOA, 9 ALIGN) with class I or class II molar relation were recruited. Standardized surface electromyography (ssEMG) was used to evaluate the activity of the masticatory muscles (masseters-MM and temporalis-TM) before the beginning of the orthodontic treatment (T1), at the end (T2), and 3 months (T3) after the end of the treatment. Intragroup (within timepoints) and intergroup differences were statistically analyzed. At T1, the mean values of each ssEMG index were within the normal range in both groups. At T2, the FOA group showed larger differential recruitment of the MM than TA muscles with a value slightly over the normal range. All the indexes were normalized at T3, and no differences emerged between groups. In the FOA group, the index of MM symmetrical contraction increased significantly at T3 compared to T1 and T2. In the ALIGN group, no significant changes were observed between each timepoint. In FOA subjects, a slight alteration of the muscular activity appeared immediately after bracket removal and this alteration normalized after 3 months of rescue. In subjects treated with aligners, no significant alteration of the muscular activity was assessed.

Indexed as

alignerfixed applianceInvisalignmuscular functionorthodonticsssEMG

Identifiers

PMID36140532
PMCPMC9498023
OpenAlexW4294152371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.