Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36140526›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Predicting Survival in Patients with Brain Tumors: Current State-of-the-Art of AI Methods Applied to MRI.

Christian di Noia, James T Grist, Frank Riemer, Maria Lyasheva, Miriana Fabozzi, Mauro Castelli, Raffaele Lodi, Caterina Tonon, Leonardo Rundo, Fulvio Zaccagna

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Christian di NoiaDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, 40125 Bologna, Italy.
James T GristDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy, and Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7223-4031
Frank RiemerMohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre (MMIV), Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, N-5021 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3805-5221
Maria LyashevaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6338-5126
Miriana FabozziCentro Medico Polispecialistico (CMO), 80058 Torre Annunziata, Italy.
Mauro CastelliNOVA Information Management School (NOVA IMS), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Campus de Campolide, 1070-312 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8793-1451
Raffaele LodiDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, 40125 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3878-304X
Caterina TononDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, 40125 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0506-499X
Leonardo RundoDepartment of Information and Electrical Engineering and Applied Mathematics, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3341-5483
Fulvio ZaccagnaDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, 40125 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6838-9532
Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna · ITHaukeland University Hospital · NOJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PTUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Salerno · IT

Funding

FSE REACT-EU PON "Research and innovation" Programme 2014-2020.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given growing clinical needs, in recent years Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques have increasingly been used to define the best approaches for survival assessment and prediction in patients with brain tumors. Advances in computational resources, and the collection of (mainly) public databases, have promoted this rapid development. This narrative review of the current state-of-the-art aimed to survey current applications of AI in predicting survival in patients with brain tumors, with a focus on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). An extensive search was performed on PubMed and Google Scholar using a Boolean research query based on MeSH terms and restricting the search to the period between 2012 and 2022. Fifty studies were selected, mainly based on Machine Learning (ML), Deep Learning (DL), radiomics-based methods, and methods that exploit traditional imaging techniques for survival assessment. In addition, we focused on two distinct tasks related to survival assessment: the first on the classification of subjects into survival classes (short and long-term or eventually short, mid and long-term) to stratify patients in distinct groups. The second focused on quantification, in days or months, of the individual survival interval. Our survey showed excellent state-of-the-art methods for the first, with accuracy up to ∼98%. The latter task appears to be the most challenging, but state-of-the-art techniques showed promising results, albeit with limitations, with C-Index up to ∼0.91. In conclusion, according to the specific task, the available computational methods perform differently, and the choice of the best one to use is non-univocal and dependent on many aspects. Unequivocally, the use of features derived from quantitative imaging has been shown to be advantageous for AI applications, including survival prediction. This evidence from the literature motivates further research in the field of AI-powered methods for survival prediction in patients with brain tumors, in particular, using the wealth of information provided by quantitative MRI techniques.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebrain tumorsmachine learningmagnetic resonance imagingsurvival prediction

Identifiers

PMID36140526
PMCPMC9497964
OpenAlexW4294151987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.