ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Predicting Survival in Patients with Brain Tumors: Current State-of-the-Art of AI Methods Applied to MRI.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of artificial intelligence in paediatric oncology imaging.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- 3D Deep Learning for Brain Tumor Segmentation and Survival Prediction: A Comprehensive Multi-Modal Analysis Using the BraTS2020 Dataset.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Functional connectivity in electroencephalography of brain tumor patients in status epilepticus: a retrospective evaluation of prognostic value.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Brain Gliomas.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Glioblastoma-Transforming Diagnosis and Treatment.Chinese neurosurgical journal · 2025Review
- Deep learning-based overall survival prediction in patients with glioblastoma: An automatic end-to-end workflow using pre-resection basic structural multiparametric MRIs.Computers in biology and medicine · 2025Article
- Predicting survival in malignant glioma using artificial intelligence.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Multimodal deep learning improves recurrence risk prediction in pediatric low-grade gliomas.Neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Transforming Medical Imaging: The Role of Artificial Intelligence Integration in PACS for Enhanced Diagnostic Accuracy and Workflow EfficiencyCurrent medical imaging · 2025Review
- Integrating multi-modal imaging in radiation treatments for glioblastoma.Neuro-oncology · 2024Review
- Integrative approach of omics and imaging data to discover new insights for understanding brain diseases.Brain communications · 2024Review
- The Diagnostic Efficiency of Quantitative Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Differentiating Medulloblastoma from Posterior Fossa Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Given growing clinical needs, in recent years Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques have increasingly been used to define the best approaches for survival assessment and prediction in patients with brain tumors. Advances in computational resources, and the collection of (mainly) public databases, have promoted this rapid development. This narrative review of the current state-of-the-art aimed to survey current applications of AI in predicting survival in patients with brain tumors, with a focus on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). An extensive search was performed on PubMed and Google Scholar using a Boolean research query based on MeSH terms and restricting the search to the period between 2012 and 2022. Fifty studies were selected, mainly based on Machine Learning (ML), Deep Learning (DL), radiomics-based methods, and methods that exploit traditional imaging techniques for survival assessment. In addition, we focused on two distinct tasks related to survival assessment: the first on the classification of subjects into survival classes (short and long-term or eventually short, mid and long-term) to stratify patients in distinct groups. The second focused on quantification, in days or months, of the individual survival interval. Our survey showed excellent state-of-the-art methods for the first, with accuracy up to ∼98%. The latter task appears to be the most challenging, but state-of-the-art techniques showed promising results, albeit with limitations, with C-Index up to ∼0.91. In conclusion, according to the specific task, the available computational methods perform differently, and the choice of the best one to use is non-univocal and dependent on many aspects. Unequivocally, the use of features derived from quantitative imaging has been shown to be advantageous for AI applications, including survival prediction. This evidence from the literature motivates further research in the field of AI-powered methods for survival prediction in patients with brain tumors, in particular, using the wealth of information provided by quantitative MRI techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.