Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36140515›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

New Trends in Immunohistochemical Methods to Estimate the Time since Death: A Review.

Monica Salerno, Giuseppe Cocimano, Salvatore Roccuzzo, Ilenia Russo, Dario Piombino-Mascali, Nicholas Márquez-Grant, Christian Zammit, Massimiliano Esposito, Francesco Sessa

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. AnViruses · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. RedefiningFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Monica Salerno"G.F. Ingrassia" Department of Medical, Surgical and Advanced Technologies, University of Catania, 95121 Catania, Italy.
Giuseppe Cocimano"G.F. Ingrassia" Department of Medical, Surgical and Advanced Technologies, University of Catania, 95121 Catania, Italy.
Salvatore Roccuzzo"G.F. Ingrassia" Department of Medical, Surgical and Advanced Technologies, University of Catania, 95121 Catania, Italy.
Ilenia Russo"G.F. Ingrassia" Department of Medical, Surgical and Advanced Technologies, University of Catania, 95121 Catania, Italy.
Dario Piombino-MascaliInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Vilnius University, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Nicholas Márquez-GrantCranfield Forensic Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5812-6189
Christian ZammitDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, 2080 Msida, Malta.ORCID 0000-0001-8646-1243
Massimiliano Esposito"G.F. Ingrassia" Department of Medical, Surgical and Advanced Technologies, University of Catania, 95121 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7880-3450
Francesco Sessa"G.F. Ingrassia" Department of Medical, Surgical and Advanced Technologies, University of Catania, 95121 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0357-8791
University of Catania · ITCranfield University · GBUniversity of Malta · MTVilnius University · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of a reliable and accurate post-mortem interval (PMI) is a major challenge in the field of forensic sciences and criminal investigation. Several laboratory techniques have recently been developed that offer a better contribution to the estimation of PMI, in addition to the traditional physical or physico-chemical (body cooling, lividity, radiocarbon dating, rigor mortis), chemical (autolysis), microbiological (putrefaction), entomological, as well as botanical parameters. Molecular biology (degradation pattern of macromolecules such as proteins, DNA, RNA), biochemical analysis of biological fluids (such as blood, cerebrospinal fluid, and vitreous humor), and immunohistochemistry are some of the most recent technological innovations. A systematic review of the literature was performed with the aim of presenting an up-to-date overview on the correlation between the immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of specific antigenic markers at different PMIs. The systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Scopus and PubMed were used as search engines from January 1, 1998 to March 1, 2022 to evaluate the effectiveness of immunohistochemistry in estimating PMI. The following keywords were used: (immunohistochemical) OR (immunohistochemistry) AND (time since death) OR (post-mortem interval) OR (PMI). A total of 6571 articles were collected. Ultimately, 16 studies were included in this review. The results of this systematic review highlighted that IHC techniques, in association with traditional methods, add, in Bayesian terms, additional information to define a more accurate time of death and PMI. However, current IHC results are numerically limited and more data and studies are desirable in the near future.

Indexed as

forensic pathologyimmunohistochemical (IHC)immunohistochemistryPMIpost-mortem intervaltime since death

Identifiers

PMID36140515
PMCPMC9497899
OpenAlexW4294142552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.