Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36140426›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2022

Trends and Perspectives of Biological Drug Approvals by the FDA: A Review from 2015 to 2021.

Alexander C Martins, Mariana Y Oshiro, Fernando Albericio, Beatriz G de la Torre, Gustavo José V Pereira, Rodrigo V Gonzaga

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Outstanding Contributions to Aerosol Pulmonary Drug Delivery.Kona : powder science and technology in Japan · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Feature Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Alexander C MartinsSchool of Health Sciences, UAM, Universidade Anhembi-Morumbi, São Paulo 03101-001, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7637-5410
Mariana Y OshiroSchool of Health Sciences, UAM, Universidade Anhembi-Morumbi, São Paulo 03101-001, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4307-5761
Fernando AlbericioSchool of Chemistry and Physics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4001, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-8946-0462
Beatriz G de la TorreKRISP, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4001, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-8521-9172
Gustavo José V PereiraSchool of Health Sciences, UAM, Universidade Anhembi-Morumbi, São Paulo 03101-001, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9811-7220
Rodrigo V GonzagaFCF-USP, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 05508-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2815-1383
Anhembi Morumbi University · BRBiomedical Research Networking Center in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine · ESUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite belonging to a relatively new class of pharmaceuticals, biological drugs have been used since the 1980s, when they brought about a breakthrough in the treatment of chronic diseases, especially cancer. They conquered a large space in the pipeline of the pharmaceutical industry and boosted the innovation portfolio and arsenal of therapeutic compounds available. Here, we report on biological drug approvals by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from 2015 to 2021. The number of drugs included in this class grew over this period, totaling 90 approvals, with an average of 13 authorizations per year. This figure contrasts with previous periods, which registered between 2 and 8 approvals per year. We highlight the great potential and advantages of biological drugs. In this context, these therapeutics show high efficacy and high selectivity, and they have brought about a significant increase in patient survival and a reduction of adverse reactions. The development and production of biopharmaceuticals pose a major challenge because these processes require cutting-edge technology, thereby making the drugs very expensive. However, we believe that, in the near future, biological medicines will be more accessible and new drugs belonging to this class will become available as new technologies emerge. Such advances will enhance the production of these biopharmaceuticals, thereby making the process increasingly profitable and less expensive, thereby bringing about greater availability of these drugs.

Indexed as

antibody–drug conjugatebiological drugsFDA approvalsfirst global approvalFood and Drug Administrationmonoclonal antibody

Identifiers

PMID36140426
PMCPMC9496574
OpenAlexW4296526508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.