Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36140201›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2022

Atherogenic Index of Plasma in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Abdulrahman Ismaiel, Oana Sabina Ciobanu, Mohamed Ismaiel, Daniel-Corneliu Leucuta, Stefan-Lucian Popa, Liliana David, Dilara Ensar, Nahlah Al Srouji, Dan L Dumitrascu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Abdulrahman Ismaiel2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-7435-271X
Oana Sabina CiobanuFaculty of Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Mohamed IsmaielDepartment of Surgery, St Michael's Hospital, A96 D628 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-5840-5137
Daniel-Corneliu LeucutaDepartment of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400349 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4218-8622
Stefan-Lucian Popa2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5508-2598
Liliana David2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Dilara EnsarDepartment of Medicine, Tallaght University Hospital, D24 NR0A Dublin, Ireland.
Nahlah Al Srouji2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Dan L Dumitrascu2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROSt Michael’s Hospital · IETallaght University Hospital · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Approximately a billion people worldwide are affected by NAFLD, which places a high clinical burden and financial cost on society. Liver biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosing NAFLD, but its invasivity limits the early diagnosis of NAFLD. Hence, it is important to look for alternate techniques in detecting and diagnosing NAFLD. NAFLD is associated with atherosclerosis. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) as a non-invasive modality for predicting NAFLD. (2) Methods: A search using electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus was carried out to find observational studies, looking at research that had been published up until the date of 11 May 2022. The included studies' quality, risk of bias, and internal validity were evaluated using the QUADAS-2 quality assessment tool. The key summary outcomes were the mean difference (MD) and area under the curve (AUC). (3) Results: A total of eight studies (81,178 participants) were included in our review, while 17% of the included participants had NAFLD. A sex distribution of 57.8% men and 42.2% women was observed. The AIP between NAFLD and the controls was not significant (MD 0.212 [95% CI 0.231-0.655]). A significant MD in AIP between the males and females with NAFLD was observed (MD 0.246 [95% CI 0.098-0.395]). The AIP predicted NAFLD with an AUC of 0.764 as well as in males (AUC 0.761) and females (AUC 0.733). (4) Conclusions: There was a substantial MD in the AIP between both sexes, but there was no significant difference in the AIP values between patients with NAFLD and the controls. The AIP is a reliable biomarker for the diagnosis of NAFLD since its ability to predict the development of NAFLD was comparable to that of the other biomarkers.

Indexed as

biomarkershepatic steatosisliver fibrosismetabolic-dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD)non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)non-invasive diagnosisscores

Identifiers

PMID36140201
PMCPMC9495578
OpenAlexW4293413335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.