ArticleBiosensors2022
Article in Biosensors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microfluidics-Integrated Spectroscopic Technologies for Food Safety and Quality Assessment: From Complex-Matrix Processing to On-Site Decision-Making.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy combined microfluidic analytical devices for on-site food safety analysis.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Review
- Capillary microfluidics aided single-cell manipulation for optical detection of bacterial pathogens.Biophysical reviews · 2026Review
- Recent Advancements in the SERS-Based Detection ofSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- SERS for Infectious Disease Diagnostics: An Advanced Platform for Pathogen Detection and Antimicrobial Resistance Analysis.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Microfluidic biosensors for rapid detection of foodborne pathogenic bacteria: recent advances and future perspectives.Frontiers in chemistry · 2025Review
- Recent advances in microfluidic-based spectroscopic approaches for pathogen detection.Biomicrofluidics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Pathogen detection is still a challenging issue for public health, especially in food products. A selective preconcentration step is also necessary if the target pathogen concentration is very low or if the sample volume is limited in the analysis. Plate counting (24-48 h) methods should be replaced by novel biosensor systems as an alternative reliable pathogen detection technique. The usage of a capillary-driven microfluidic chip is an alternative method for pathogen detection, with the combination of surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) measurements. Here, we constructed microchambers with capillary microchannels to provide nanoparticle-pathogen transportation from one chamber to the other.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.