Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36140118›Full record

ReviewBiosensors2022

Nanomaterial-Based Electrochemical Nanodiagnostics for Human and Gut Metabolites Diagnostics: Recent Advances and Challenges.

Amit K Yadav, Damini Verma, Reena K Sajwan, Mrinal Poddar, Sumit K Yadav, Awadhesh Kumar Verma, Pratima R Solanki

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biosensors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amit K YadavNano-Bio Laboratory, Special Centre for Nanoscience, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110067, India.
Damini VermaNano-Bio Laboratory, Special Centre for Nanoscience, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110067, India.
Reena K SajwanNano-Bio Laboratory, Special Centre for Nanoscience, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110067, India.
Mrinal PoddarNano-Bio Laboratory, Special Centre for Nanoscience, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110067, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7683-6985
Sumit K YadavDepartment of Biotechnology, Vinoba Bhave University, Hazaribagh 825301, India.
Awadhesh Kumar VermaNano-Bio Laboratory, Special Centre for Nanoscience, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110067, India.
Pratima R SolankiNano-Bio Laboratory, Special Centre for Nanoscience, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110067, India.
Jawaharlal Nehru University · INVinoba Bhave University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolites are the intermediatory products of metabolic processes catalyzed by numerous enzymes found inside the cells. Detecting clinically relevant metabolites is important to understand their physiological and biological functions along with the evolving medical diagnostics. Rapid advances in detecting the tiny metabolites such as biomarkers that signify disease hallmarks have an immense need for high-performance identifying techniques. Low concentrations are found in biological fluids because the metabolites are difficult to dissolve in an aqueous medium. Therefore, the selective and sensitive study of metabolites as biomarkers in biological fluids is problematic. The different non-electrochemical and conventional methods need a long time of analysis, long sampling, high maintenance costs, and costly instrumentation. Hence, employing electrochemical techniques in clinical examination could efficiently meet the requirements of fully automated, inexpensive, specific, and quick means of biomarker detection. The electrochemical methods are broadly utilized in several emerging and established technologies, and electrochemical biosensors are employed to detect different metabolites. This review describes the advancement in electrochemical sensors developed for clinically associated human metabolites, including glucose, lactose, uric acid, urea, cholesterol, etc., and gut metabolites such as TMAO, TMA, and indole derivatives. Different sensing techniques are evaluated for their potential to achieve relevant degrees of multiplexing, specificity, and sensitivity limits. Moreover, we have also focused on the opportunities and remaining challenges for integrating the electrochemical sensor into the point-of-care (POC) devices.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesNanostructuresBiomarkersCholesterolElectrochemical TechniquesGlucoseHumansIndolesLactoseUreaUric AcidBiomarkersCholesterolGlucoseIndolesLactoseUreaUric Acidbiomarkersbiosensorsdiagnosismetabolitesnanomaterials

Identifiers

PMID36140118
PMCPMC9496054
OpenAlexW4295063507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.