Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36140036›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Tailoring Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) Interventions to the Cultural Context: An Investigation of AMS Programs Operating in Northern Italian Acute-Care Hospitals.

Costanza Vicentini, Valentina Blengini, Giulia Libero, Manuela Martella, Carla Maria Zotti, Working Group “Unità Prevenzione Rischio Infettivo (UPRI), Regione Piemonte”

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Costanza VicentiniDepartment of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Via Santena 5 bis, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0056-2463
Valentina BlenginiDepartment of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Via Santena 5 bis, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Giulia LiberoDepartment of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Via Santena 5 bis, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2058-6224
Manuela MartellaDepartment of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Via Santena 5 bis, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4269-6902
Carla Maria ZottiDepartment of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Via Santena 5 bis, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Working Group “Unità Prevenzione Rischio Infettivo (UPRI), Regione Piemonte”

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotic misuse and overuse are important contributors to the development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs are coordinated sets of actions aiming to promote appropriate antibiotic use, improving patient outcomes whilst reducing AMR. Two main organizational models for AMS programs have been described: restrictive strategies (RS) vs. enabling strategies (ES). Evaluating and understanding social and cultural influences on antibiotic decision-making are critical for the development of successful and sustainable context-specific AMS programs. Characteristics and surrogate outcomes of AMS programs operating in acute-care hospitals of Piedmont in north-western Italy were investigated. The aim of this study was assessing whether RS vs. ES operating in our context were associated with different outcomes in terms of total antimicrobial usage and percentage of methicillin-resistant

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistanceantimicrobial stewardshipimplementation scienceItaly

Identifiers

PMID36140036
PMCPMC9495251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.