Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36140013›Full record

ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

SER-109: An Oral Investigational Microbiome Therapeutic for Patients with Recurrent

Sahil Khanna, Matthew Sims, Thomas J Louie, Monika Fischer, Kerry LaPlante, Jessica Allegretti, Brooke R Hasson, Allyson T Fonte, Christopher McChalicher, David S Ege and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Alternative treatment of recurrentFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Bacterial live therapeutics for human diseases.Molecular systems biology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Sahil KhannaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Matthew SimsSection of Infectious Diseases and International Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Beaumont, Royal Oak, MI 48073, USA.
Thomas J LouieCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
Monika FischerDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Kerry LaPlanteDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA.
Jessica AllegrettiDivision of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Brooke R HassonSeres Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Allyson T FonteSeres Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Christopher McChalicherSeres Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
David S EgeSeres Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Jessica A BryantSeres Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Timothy J StraubSeres Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Christopher B FordSeres Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Matthew R HennSeres Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8734-5797
Elaine E L WangSeres Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Lisa von MoltkeSeres Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Mark H WilcoxUniversity of Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK.
Seres Therapeutics (United States) · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USOakland University · USUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Rhode Island · US

Funding

Seres Therapeutics (United States) NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is classified as an urgent health threat by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and affects nearly 500,000 Americans annually. Approximately 20−25% of patients with a primary infection experience a recurrence, and the risk of recurrence increases with subsequent episodes to greater than 40%. The leading risk factor for CDI is broad-spectrum antibiotics, which leads to a loss of microbial diversity and impaired colonization resistance. Current FDA-approved CDI treatment strategies target toxin or toxin-producing bacteria, but do not address microbiome disruption, which is key to the pathogenesis of recurrent CDI. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) reduces the risk of recurrent CDI through the restoration of microbial diversity. However, FDA safety alerts describing hospitalizations and deaths related to pathogen transmission have raised safety concerns with the use of unregulated and unstandardized donor-derived products. SER-109 is an investigational oral microbiome therapeutic composed of purified spore-forming Firmicutes. SER-109 was superior to a placebo in reducing CDI recurrence at Week 8 (12% vs. 40%, respectively; p < 0.001) in adults with a history of recurrent CDI with a favorable observed safety profile. Here, we discuss the role of the microbiome in CDI pathogenesis and the clinical development of SER-109, including its rigorous manufacturing process, which mitigates the risk of pathogen transmission. Additionally, we discuss compositional and functional changes in the gastrointestinal microbiome in patients with recurrent CDI following treatment with SER-109 that are critical to a sustained clinical response.

Indexed as

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI)Firmicutesmicrobial diversitymicrobiome therapeuticsrecurrent CDISER-109

Identifiers

PMID36140013
PMCPMC9495252
OpenAlexW4295549046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.