Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36140012›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Macrolide versus Non-Macrolide in Combination with Steroids for the Treatment of Lobar or Segmental

Eunha Bae, Ye Ji Kim, Hyun Mi Kang, Dae Chul Jeong, Jin Han Kang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Current Practice in the Diagnosis and Management ofJournal of Korean medical science · 2026
    Article
  2. East Asia as a sentinel: risk-stratified corticosteroid therapy for paediatric macrolide-resistantEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Emergence of Clinically Macrolide-UnresponsiveAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eunha BaeDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea.
Ye Ji KimDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea.
Hyun Mi KangDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0513-8407
Dae Chul JeongDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea.
Jin Han KangDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea.
Catholic University of Korea · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last few decades, macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MRMP) has been increasing in proportion. This study aimed to evaluate the treatment outcomes of children with lobar or segmental MP pneumonia unresponsive to the initial 3−5-day macrolide therapy, who then switched to either a non-macrolide, macrolide + steroid, or a non-macrolide + steroid regimen, according to the 2019 KSPID and KAPARD guideline during the 2019−2020 Mycoplasma epidemic in South Korea. A total of 190 patients <18 years old were admitted during the study period for MP lobar or segmental pneumonia, and 16.8% (n = 32/190) were responsive to the initial macrolide monotherapy, whereas 83.2% (158/190) were refractory. The median age of the patients was 7 (interquartile range [IQR], 5−9) years old and 46.2% (n = 73/158) were male. The overall treatment success rates of non-macrolide, macrolide + steroid, and non-macrolide + steroid groups were 46.2%, 80.8%, and 100.0%, respectively. Patients in the non-macrolide + steroid group had the shortest fever duration after a regimen change of 1 (IQR, 0−3) day compared with patients in the non-macrolide group and macrolide + steroid group; 2 (IQR, 1−4) days and 2 (IQR, 1−3.3) days (p = 0.004), respectively. Follow-up CRP (ß, 0.169; CI, 0.050−0.287; p = 0.006), macrolide + steroid therapy (ß, −1.694; CI, −2.463−−0.925; p < 0.001), and non-macrolide+ steroid therapy (ß, −2.224; CI, −3.321−−1.127; p < 0.001) were shown to be significantly associated with the duration of fever after admission. To conclude, in patients with severe MP pneumonia that failed to respond to the initial macrolide therapy, a non-macrolide + steroid had the highest treatment success rate and a shorter duration of fever.

Indexed as

macrolideMycoplasma pneumoniaeresistance

Identifiers

PMID36140012
PMCPMC9495205
OpenAlexW4295548145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.