Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36139960›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Mixing Propolis from Different Apiaries and Harvesting Years: Towards Propolis Standardization?

Marta Peixoto, Ana Sofia Freitas, Ana Cunha, Rui Oliveira, Cristina Almeida-Aguiar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. FEMS microbes · 2023
    Article
  9. Antimicrobial Natural Products.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marta PeixotoDepartment of Biology, School of Sciences, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal.
Ana Sofia FreitasDepartment of Biology, School of Sciences, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal.
Ana CunhaDepartment of Biology, School of Sciences, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0822-8248
Rui OliveiraDepartment of Biology, School of Sciences, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3989-8925
Cristina Almeida-AguiarDepartment of Biology, School of Sciences, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8223-8634

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia PD/BD/128276/2017, PD/00122/2012)Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UID/AGR/04033/2019, UIDB/04033/2020 and UIDB/04050/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global demand for safe, effective and natural products has been increasing in parallel with consumers' concerns about personal and environmental health. Propolis, a traditional and potentially medicinal product with several health benefits, is a beehive product with a worldwide reputation. However, despite the bioactivities reported, the low productivity and high chemical heterogeneity have been extensively hampering broader industrial uses. To assist in overcoming some of these problems, we prepared and characterized mixtures of ethanol extracts of a heterogeneous propolis sample (Pereiro) collected over a five-year period (2011-2015) and, additionally, we mixed two different propolis samples from distinct regions of Portugal (Pereiro and Gerês), also harvested at different times. An investigation of the antimicrobial and antioxidant properties, as well as characterization of the chemical composition of the eleven propolis blends were performed in this work. The antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of such blends of propolis samples, either from different localities and/or different years, were maintained, or even enhanced, when a comparison of the individual extracts was conducted. The differences in the chemical composition of the original propolis samples were also diluted in the mixtures. The results reemphasize the great potential of propolis and suggest that mixing different samples, regardless of provenance or harvesting date, can contribute to propolis standardization while simultaneously increasing its availability and adding value to this beehive byproduct.

Indexed as

antimicrobial activityantioxidant potentialblends of propolisethanol extractsphenolic compoundspropolis

Identifiers

PMID36139960
PMCPMC9495078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.