Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36139777›Full record

ArticleAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Phytochemical Profile, Antioxidant Potential and Toxicity Evaluation of the Essential Oils from

Márcia Moraes Cascaes, Ângelo Antônio Barbosa De Moraes, Jorddy Neves Cruz, Celeste de Jesus Pereira Franco, Renan Campos E Silva, Lidiane Diniz do Nascimento, Oberdan Oliveira Ferreira, Tainá Oliveira Dos Anjos, Mozaniel Santana de Oliveira, Giselle Maria Skelding Pinheiro Guilhon and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Essential Oil ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Antioxidant Activity of Essential Oils.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Márcia Moraes CascaesPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Química, Universidade Federal do Pará, Rua Augusto Corrêa S/N, Guamá, Belém 66075-900, PA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5761-4466
Ângelo Antônio Barbosa De MoraesLaboratório Adolpho Ducke-Coordenação de Botânica, Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Av. Perimetral, 1901, Terra Firme, Belém 66077-830, PA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4586-8308
Jorddy Neves CruzLaboratory of Functional and Structural Biology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Universidade Federal do Pará, Rua Augusto Corrêa S/N, Guamá, Belém 66075-900, PA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0529-3714
Celeste de Jesus Pereira FrancoLaboratório Adolpho Ducke-Coordenação de Botânica, Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Av. Perimetral, 1901, Terra Firme, Belém 66077-830, PA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2772-8451
Renan Campos E SilvaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Química, Universidade Federal do Pará, Rua Augusto Corrêa S/N, Guamá, Belém 66075-900, PA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0846-9140
Lidiane Diniz do NascimentoLaboratório Adolpho Ducke-Coordenação de Botânica, Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Av. Perimetral, 1901, Terra Firme, Belém 66077-830, PA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1370-4472
Oberdan Oliveira FerreiraPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Biotecnologia-Rede Bionorte, Universidade Federal do Pará, Rua Augusto Corrêa S/N, Guamá, Belém 66075-900, PA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7881-8625
Tainá Oliveira Dos AnjosPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Biológicas-Botânica Tropical, Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi/Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia, Av. Perimetral, 1901, Terra Firme, Belém 66077-830, PA, Brazil.
Mozaniel Santana de OliveiraLaboratório Adolpho Ducke-Coordenação de Botânica, Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Av. Perimetral, 1901, Terra Firme, Belém 66077-830, PA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4076-2443
Giselle Maria Skelding Pinheiro GuilhonPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Química, Universidade Federal do Pará, Rua Augusto Corrêa S/N, Guamá, Belém 66075-900, PA, Brazil.
Eloisa Helena de Aguiar AndradePrograma de Pós-Graduação em Química, Universidade Federal do Pará, Rua Augusto Corrêa S/N, Guamá, Belém 66075-900, PA, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0640-7496
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi · BRUniversidade Federal do Pará · BR

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The essential oils (EOs) of Duguetia echinophora, D. riparia, Xylopia emarginata and X. frutescens (Annonaceae) were obtained by hydrodistillation and the chemical composition was analyzed by GC-MS. An antioxidant assay using the ABTS and DPPH radicals scavenging method and cytotoxic assays against Artemia salina were also performed. We evaluated the interaction of the major compounds of the most toxic EO (X. emarginata) with the binding pocket of the enzyme Acetylcholinesterase, a molecular target related to toxicity in models of Artemia salina. The chemical composition of the EO of D. echinophora was characterized by β-phellandrene (39.12%), sabinene (17.08%) and terpinolene (11.17%). Spathulenol (22.22%), caryophyllene oxide (12.21%), humulene epoxide II (11.86%) and allo-aromadendrene epoxide (10.20%) were the major constituents of the EO from D. riparia. Spathulenol (5.65%) and caryophyllene oxide (5.63%) were the major compounds of the EO from X. emarginata. The EO of X. frutescens was characterized by α-pinene (20.84%) and byciclogermacrene (7.85%). The results of the radical scavenger DPPH assays ranged from 15.87 to 69.38% and the highest percentage of inhibition was observed for the EO of X. emarginata, while for ABTS radical scavenging, the antioxidant capacity of EOs varied from 14.61 to 63.67%, and the highest percentage of inhibition was observed for the EO of X. frutescens. The EOs obtained from D. echinophora, X. emarginata and X. frutescens showed high toxicity, while the EO of D. riparia was non-toxic. Because the EO of X. emarginata is the most toxic, we evaluated how its major constituents were able to interact with the Acetylcholinesterase enzyme. The docking results show that the compounds are able to bind to the binding pocket through non-covalent interactions with the residues of the binding pocket. The species X. emarginata and X. frutescens are the most promising sources of antioxidant compounds; in addition, the results obtained for preliminary cytotoxicity of the EOs of these species may also indicate a potential biological activity.

Indexed as

Amazonbioactive compoundsmedicinal plantnatural productsvolatile compounds

Identifiers

PMID36139777
PMCPMC9495368
OpenAlexW4293685920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.