Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36139733›Full record

ArticleAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Gold Nanoparticles Inhibit Steroid-Insensitive Asthma in Mice Preserving Histone Deacetylase 2 and NRF2 Pathways.

Magda F Serra, Amanda C Cotias, Andreza S Pimentel, Ana Carolina S de Arantes, Ana Lucia A Pires, Manuella Lanzetti, Jandir M Hickmann, Emiliano Barreto, Vinicius F Carvalho, Patrícia M R E Silva and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Treatment of lung diseasesMaterials today. Bio · 2025
    Review
  6. Nanotechnology-Based Therapeutics for Airway Inflammatory Diseases.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2025
    Review
  7. Nanoparticles to target asthma.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Magda F SerraLaboratory of Inflammation, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, RJ, Brazil.
Amanda C CotiasLaboratory of Inflammation, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, RJ, Brazil.
Andreza S PimentelLaboratory of Inflammation, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, RJ, Brazil.
Ana Carolina S de ArantesLaboratory of Inflammation, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, RJ, Brazil.
Ana Lucia A PiresLaboratory of Inflammation, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, RJ, Brazil.
Manuella LanzettiInstitute of Biomedical Science, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-902, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3913-608X
Jandir M HickmannInstitute of Physics, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 91509-900, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0310-4190
Emiliano BarretoLaboratory of Cell Biology, Federal University of Alagoas, Maceió 50072-900, AL, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4956-5075
Vinicius F CarvalhoLaboratory of Inflammation, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, RJ, Brazil.
Patrícia M R E SilvaLaboratory of Inflammation, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, RJ, Brazil.
Renato S B CordeiroLaboratory of Inflammation, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, RJ, Brazil.
Marco Aurélio MartinsLaboratory of Inflammation, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro 21040-360, RJ, Brazil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRUniversidade Federal de Alagoas · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

FAPERJ E-26/010.000983/2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGold nanoparticles (AuNPs) can inhibit pivotal pathological changes in experimental asthma, but their effect on steroid-insensitive asthma is unclear. The current study assessed the effectiveness of nebulized AuNPs in a murine model of glucocorticoid (GC)-resistant asthma.

methodsA/J mice were sensitized and subjected to intranasal instillations of ovalbumin (OVA) once a week for nine weeks. Two weeks after starting allergen stimulations, mice were subjected to Budesonide or AuNP nebulization 1 h before stimuli. Analyses were carried out 24 h after the last provocation.

resultsWe found that mice challenged with OVA had airway hyperreactivity, eosinophil, and neutrophil infiltrates in the lung, concomitantly with peribronchiolar fibrosis, mucus production, and pro-inflammatory cytokine generation compared to sham-challenged mice. These changes were inhibited in mice treated with AuNPs, but not Budesonide. In the GC-resistant asthmatic mice, oxidative stress was established, marked by a reduction in nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) levels and catalase activity, accompanied by elevated values of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), phosphoinositide 3-kinases δ (PI3Kδ) expression, as well as a reduction in the nuclear expression of histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2) in the lung tissue, all of which sensitive to AuNPs but not Budesonide treatment.

conclusionThese findings suggest that AuNPs can improve GC-insensitive asthma by preserving HDAC2 and NRF2.

Indexed as

gold nanoparticleHDAC2lung inflammationNRF2oxidative imbalancesteroid-insensitive asthma

Identifiers

PMID36139733
PMCPMC9495660
OpenAlexW4293412891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.