ArticleCancers2022
Generation and Evaluation of Synthetic Computed Tomography (CT) from Cone-Beam CT (CBCT) by Incorporating Feature-Driven Loss into Intensity-Based Loss Functions in Deep Convolutional Neural Network.
Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic literature review: deep learning techniques for synthetic medical image generation and their applications in radiotherapy.Frontiers in radiology · 2024Pooled it
- Supervised deep learning-based synthetic computed tomography from kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography images for adaptive radiation therapy in head and neck cancer.Radiation oncology journal · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep convolutional neural network (CNN) helped enhance image quality of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) by generating synthetic CT. Most of the previous works, however, trained network by intensity-based loss functions, possibly undermining to promote image feature similarity. The verifications were not sufficient to demonstrate clinical applicability, either. This work investigated the effect of variable loss functions combining feature- and intensity-driven losses in synthetic CT generation, followed by strengthening the verification of generated images in both image similarity and dosimetry accuracy. The proposed strategy highlighted the feature-driven quantification in (1) training the network by perceptual loss, besides L1 and structural similarity (SSIM) losses regarding anatomical similarity, and (2) evaluating image similarity by feature mapping ratio (FMR), besides conventional metrics. In addition, the synthetic CT images were assessed in terms of dose calculating accuracy by a commercial Monte-Carlo algorithm. The network was trained with 50 paired CBCT-CT scans acquired at the same CT simulator and treatment unit to constrain environmental factors any other than loss functions. For 10 independent cases, incorporating perceptual loss into L1 and SSIM losses outperformed the other combinations, which enhanced FMR of image similarity by 10%, and the dose calculating accuracy by 1-2% of gamma passing rate in 1%/1mm criterion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.