Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36139659›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Current Approaches to the Management of Patients with Endometrial Cancer.

Emmanouil Kalampokas, Georgios Giannis, Theodoros Kalampokas, Angeliki-Astero Papathanasiou, Dimitra Mitsopoulou, Evangelia Tsironi, Olga Triantafyllidou, Mahalakshmi Gurumurthy, David E Parkin, Mary Cairns and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07339384 (Circulating Tumor DNA Assessment in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07339384 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Circulating Tumor DNA Assessment in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer (SIGNAL-EMC 101)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNatera, Inc.Ran2026 to 2034Enrolled1,010ConditionsEndometrial CancerArmsSignatera Genome ultra-sensitive ctDNA blood test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Nanocarrier drug delivery systems for gynecological cancer therapeutics.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Emmanouil KalampokasUnit of Gynecologic Oncology, Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 115 28 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-1444-6161
Georgios GiannisMedical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 115 28 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-7762-8398
Theodoros KalampokasUnit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 115 28 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-1379-894X
Angeliki-Astero PapathanasiouMedical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 115 28 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7713-044X
Dimitra MitsopoulouMedical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 115 28 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-5002-1788
Evangelia TsironiMedical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 115 28 Athens, Greece.
Olga TriantafyllidouUnit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 115 28 Athens, Greece.
Mahalakshmi GurumurthyDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen AB25 2ZN, UK.
David E ParkinHonorary Consultant Gynaecologist Oncologist, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen AB25 2ZN, UK.
Mary CairnsDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen AB25 2ZN, UK.
Nikolaos F VlahosUnit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 115 28 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-8479-6517

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of endometrial cancer (EC) is rising and healthcare professionals need to be informed about the latest data on the constant developments in the field of its management. With particular interest in the classification and management of EC, we surveyed current literature, national and international data, and guidelines, as well as the latest studies to present the most recent data regarding the management of EC. It became evident that despite the consensus on low-risk EC, there are still controversies surrounding the management of high-risk EC, especially regarding the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Our aim is to present the old and new perspectives in the management of EC, the different available surgical routes, the possible desire for fertility preservation, the role of adjuvant therapies and the focus on the advantages and the limitations of the implementation of SLNB in therapeutic strategies. It became evident throughout our search and based on literature data that minimally invasive surgery (MIS) leads to satisfying outcomes, thus becoming gradually the preferred route of surgery, while SLNB could provide essential information and guidance about the overall management needed in cases of both low-risk and high-risk EC.

Indexed as

classificationendometrial cancerlymphadenectomymanagementsentinel lymph node biopsy

Identifiers

PMID36139659
PMCPMC9497194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.