ArticleCancers2022
Clinical Utility of Rapid On-Site Evaluation of Touch Imprint Cytology during Cryobiopsy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions.
Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic accuracy of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) during robotic bronchoscopy.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Diagnostic utility of cryobiopsy for invasive mucinous lung adenocarcinoma.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Article
- Optimizing Endoscopic Respiratory Diagnostics with Cytology: An Update on Touch Imprints with a Comparative Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Minimally Invasive Sampling of Mediastinal Lesions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cryobiopsy enables us to obtain larger specimens than conventional forceps biopsy despite the caution regarding complications. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of rapid on-site evaluation of touch imprint cytology (ROSE-TIC) during cryobiopsy of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs). We retrospectively reviewed the data of consecutive patients who underwent cryobiopsy for solid PPLs between June 2020 and December 2021. ROSE-TIC was performed on the first specimen obtained via cryobiopsy and assessed using Diff-Quik staining. The results of ROSE-TIC for each patient were compared with the histological findings of the first cryobiopsy specimen. Sixty-three patients were enrolled in this study. Overall, 57 (90.5%) lesions were ≤30 mm in size and 37 (58.7%) had positive bronchus signs. The radial endobronchial ultrasound findings were located within and adjacent to the lesion in 46.0% and 54.0% of the cases, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the ROSE results for histological findings of the corresponding specimens were 69.8%, 90.0%, 93.8%, and 58.1%, respectively. The concordance rate was 76.2%. In conclusion, ROSE-TIC, due to its high specificity and positive predictive value, may be a potential tool in deciding whether cryobiopsy sampling could be finished during bronchoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.