Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36139651›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

CRL4

Joanna Barankiewicz, Aleksander Salomon-Perzyński, Irena Misiewicz-Krzemińska, Ewa Lech-Marańda

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. NGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joanna BarankiewiczDepartment of Hematology, Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5029-9173
Aleksander Salomon-PerzyńskiDepartment of Hematology, Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8394-5346
Irena Misiewicz-KrzemińskaDepartment of Experimental Hematology, Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4206-8586
Ewa Lech-MarańdaDepartment of Hematology, Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.
Instytut Hematologii i Transfuzjologi · PL

Funding

National Science Centre in Poland 2014/3/B/NZ5/03160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematological malignancy with a recurrent clinical course. The introduction of immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) was one of the milestones in MM therapy leading to a significant improvement in patients' prognosis. Currently, IMiDs are the backbone of MM therapy in newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory settings. It is now known that IMiDs exert their anti-myeloma activity mainly by binding cereblon (CRBN), the substrate receptor protein of the CRL4 E3 ubiquitin ligase (CRL4

Indexed as

cerebloncereblon E3 ligase modulatorsimmunomodulatory drugsmultiple myelomaproteolysis targeting chimeras

Identifiers

PMID36139651
PMCPMC9496858
OpenAlexW4296312353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.