Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36139585›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Development and Validation of a Predictive Model for Toxicity of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer in the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 Phase III Trial.

Markus Diefenhardt, Daniel Martin, Ethan B Ludmir, Maximilian Fleischmann, Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz, Michael Ghadimi, Rebekka Kosmala, Bülent Polat, Tim Friede, Bruce D Minsky and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Markus DiefenhardtDepartment of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9042-9729
Daniel MartinDepartment of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany.
Ethan B LudmirDivision of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77054, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5472-5344
Maximilian FleischmannDepartment of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany.
Ralf-Dieter HofheinzDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Mannheim, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
Michael GhadimiDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
Rebekka KosmalaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
Bülent PolatDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4677-424X
Tim FriedeDepartment of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5347-7441
Bruce D MinskyDivision of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77054, USA.
Claus RödelDepartment of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany.
Emmanouil FokasDepartment of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University of Frankfurt, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is a lack of predictive models to identify patients at risk of high neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT)-related acute toxicity in rectal cancer. Patient and Methods: The CAO/ARO/AIO-04 trial was divided into a development (n = 831) and a validation (n = 405) cohort. Using a best subset selection approach, predictive models for grade 3−4 acute toxicity were calculated including clinicopathologic characteristics, pretreatment blood parameters, and baseline results of quality-of-life questionnaires and evaluated using the area under the ROC curve. The final model was internally and externally validated. Results: In the development cohort, 155 patients developed grade 3−4 toxicities due to CRT. In the final evaluation, 15 parameters were included in the logistic regression models using best-subset selection. BMI, gender, and emotional functioning remained significant for predicting toxicity, with a discrimination ability adjusted for overfitting of AUC 0.687. The odds of experiencing high-grade toxicity were 3.8 times higher in the intermediate and 6.4 times higher in the high-risk group (p < 0.001). Rates of toxicity (p = 0.001) and low treatment adherence (p = 0.007) remained significantly different in the validation cohort, whereas discrimination ability was not significantly worse (DeLong test 0.09). Conclusion: We developed and validated a predictive model for toxicity using gender, BMI, and emotional functioning. Such a model could help identify patients at risk for treatment-related high-grade toxicity to assist in treatment guidance and patient participation in shared decision making.

Indexed as

chemoradiotherapyneoadjuvantrectal cancerrisk scoretoxicity

Identifiers

PMID36139585
PMCPMC9497244
OpenAlexW4295592746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.