Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36139580›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Safety and Efficacy of the Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator (SGAP) Flap in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Jérôme Martineau, Daniel F Kalbermatten, Carlo M Oranges

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jérôme MartineauDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva University, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.
Daniel F KalbermattenDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva University, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.
Carlo M OrangesDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva University, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1735-5329
University Hospital of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: The superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) flap is a prominent technique for autologous breast reconstruction. Unlike other commonly used techniques, current literature on the safety and efficacy of the SGAP flap is heterogenous and limited. The aim of this article was to perform a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of postoperative outcomes and complications associated with SGAP flap autologous breast reconstructions. (2) Methods: A systematic literature search of multiple databases was performed using the PRISMA guidelines. We included articles evaluating SGAP flaps in autologous breast reconstruction. Outcomes and complications were recorded and analyzed. Proportions and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated in a random-effects meta-analysis. (3) Results: Fourteen studies meeting inclusion criteria, representing a total of 667 SGAP flaps, were included. The total flap loss rate was 1% (95% CI 0-3%), partial flap loss rate was 1% (95% CI 0-3%), hematoma rate was 3% (95% CI 1-6%), emergent surgical re-exploration rate was 5% (95% CI 2-9%), and overall donor-site complications were 12% (95% CI 4-23%). (4) Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis provide comprehensive knowledge on the efficacy and safety of the SGAP flap in autologous breast reconstruction. It demonstrates its overall safety and low complication rate, validating its important role as an effective option in breast reconstruction.

Indexed as

breast reconstructionfree flapmeta-analysismicrosurgeryoutcomesSGAPsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36139580
PMCPMC9497191
OpenAlexW4295560653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.