Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36139569›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Appropriate Lymph Node Dissection Sites for Cancer in the Body and Tail of the Pancreas: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Kimitaka Tanaka, Yasutoshi Kimura, Tsuyoshi Hayashi, Yoshiyasu Ambo, Makoto Yoshida, Kazufumi Umemoto, Takeshi Murakami, Toshimichi Asano, Toru Nakamura, Satoshi Hirano

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Surgical management of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a narrative review.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kimitaka TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9899-4581
Yasutoshi KimuraDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8556, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7790-9250
Tsuyoshi HayashiCenter for Gastroenterology, Teine-Keijinkai Hospital, Sapporo 006-8555, Japan.
Yoshiyasu AmboDepartment of Surgery, Teine-Keijinkai Hospital, Sapporo 006-8555, Japan.
Makoto YoshidaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kin-ikyo Chuo Hospital, Sapporo 007-8505, Japan.
Kazufumi UmemotoDepartment of Surgery, Teine-Keijinkai Hospital, Sapporo 006-8555, Japan.
Takeshi MurakamiDepartment of Surgery, Surgical Oncology and Science, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8556, Japan.
Toshimichi AsanoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan.
Toru NakamuraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan.
Satoshi HiranoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan.
Hokkaido University · JPTeine Keijinkai Hospital · JPSapporo Medical University · JPKin-ikyo Chuo Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distal pancreatectomy (DP) with lymphadenectomy is the standard surgery for pancreatic body-tail cancer. However, the optimal lymph node (LN) dissection area for DP remains controversial. Thus, we evaluated the frequency and patterns of LN metastasis based on the tumor site. In this multicenter retrospective study, we examined 235 patients who underwent DP for pancreatic cancer. Tumor sites were classified as confined to the pancreatic body (Pb) or pancreatic tail (Pt). The efficacy index (EI) was calculated by multiplying the frequency of metastasis to each LN station by the five-year survival rate of patients with metastasis to that station. LN metastasis occurred in 132/235 (56.2%) of the patients. Patients with Pb tumors showed no metastasis to the splenic hilum LN. Distal splenic artery LNs and anterosuperior/posterior common hepatic artery LNs did not benefit from dissection for Pb and Pt tumors, respectively. In multivariate analysis, splenic artery LN metastasis was identified as an independent predictor of poor overall survival in patients with pancreatic body-tail cancer. In conclusion, differences in metastatic LN sites were evident in pancreatic body-tail cancers confined to the Pb or Pt. Spleen-preserving pancreatectomy might be feasible for Pb cancer.

Indexed as

distal pancreatectomyefficacy indexlymph node metastasispancreatic cancerspleen preservation

Identifiers

PMID36139569
PMCPMC9497245
OpenAlexW4295560182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.