Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36139547›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

White Paper: Mimetics of Class 2 Tumor Suppressor Proteins as Novel Drug Candidates for Personalized Cancer Therapy.

Edgar Dahl, Sophia Villwock, Peter Habenberger, Axel Choidas, Michael Rose, Bert M Klebl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Edgar DahlInstitute of Pathology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, D-52074 Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8439-7994
Sophia VillwockInstitute of Pathology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, D-52074 Aachen, Germany.
Peter HabenbergerLead Discovery Center GmbH (LDC), Otto-Hahn-Straße 15, D-44227 Dortmund, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1251-264X
Axel ChoidasLead Discovery Center GmbH (LDC), Otto-Hahn-Straße 15, D-44227 Dortmund, Germany.
Michael RoseInstitute of Pathology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, D-52074 Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4340-1117
Bert M KleblLead Discovery Center GmbH (LDC), Otto-Hahn-Straße 15, D-44227 Dortmund, Germany.
Lead Discovery Center (Germany) · DERWTH Aachen University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of our proposed concept is to find new target structures for combating cancers with unmet medical needs. This, unfortunately, still applies to the majority of the clinically most relevant tumor entities such as, for example, liver cancer, pancreatic cancer, and many others. Current target structures almost all belong to the class of oncogenic proteins caused by tumor-specific genetic alterations, such as activating mutations, gene fusions, or gene amplifications, often referred to as cancer "driver alterations" or just "drivers." However, restoring the lost function of tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) could also be a valid approach to treating cancer. TSG-derived proteins are usually considered as control systems of cells against oncogenic properties; thus, they represent the brakes in the "car-of-life." Restoring these tumor-defective brakes by gene therapy has not been successful so far, with a few exceptions. It can be assumed that most TSGs are not being inactivated by genetic alteration (class 1 TSGs) but rather by epigenetic silencing (class 2 TSGs or short "C2TSGs"). Reactivation of C2TSGs in cancer therapy is being addressed by the use of DNA demethylating agents and histone deacetylase inhibitors which act on the whole cancer cell genome. These epigenetic therapies have neither been particularly successful, probably because they are "shotgun" approaches that, although acting on C2TSGs, may also reactivate epigenetically silenced oncogenic sequences in the genome. Thus, new strategies are needed to exploit the therapeutic potential of C2TSGs, which have also been named DNA methylation cancer driver genes or "DNAme drivers" recently. Here we present a concept for a new translational and therapeutic approach that focuses on the phenotypic imitation ("mimesis") of proteins encoded by highly disease-relevant C2TSGs/DNAme drivers. Molecular knowledge on C2TSGs is used in two complementary approaches having the translational concept of defining mimetic drugs in common: First, a concept is presented how truncated and/or genetically engineered C2TSG proteins, consisting solely of domains with defined tumor suppressive function can be developed as biologicals. Second, a method is described for identifying small molecules that can mimic the effect of the C2TSG protein lost in the cancer cell. Both approaches should open up a new, previously untapped discovery space for anticancer drugs.

Indexed as

class 2 tumor suppressor genesDNA methylation driversITIH5mimeticspersonalized cancer therapySFRP1small moleculestumor suppressor proteins

Identifiers

PMID36139547
PMCPMC9496810
OpenAlexW4295211195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.