ArticleCancers2022
White Paper: Mimetics of Class 2 Tumor Suppressor Proteins as Novel Drug Candidates for Personalized Cancer Therapy.
Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanisms and implications of epithelial cell plasticity in the bladder.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- The Janus Face of SPAG6: Inducing EMT in Luminal Breast Cancer Cells Amidst Widespread Expression Loss in Breast Tumours.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
- Promoter hypermethylation of SFRP1 is an allele fraction-dependent prognostic biomarker in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- High Expression of the Tumor Suppressor Protein ITIH5 in Cholangiocarcinomas Correlates with a Favorable Prognosis.Cancers · 2024Article
- Genetic deletion of ITIH5 leads to increased development of adipose tissue in mice.Biological research · 2024Article
- Epigenetic Therapies in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Concepts, Visions, and Challenges.Cancers · 2024Review
- ITIH5 as a multifaceted player in pancreatic cancer suppression, impairing tyrosine kinase signaling, cell adhesion and migration.Molecular oncology · 2024Article
- An Overview on the Emerging Role of the Plasma Protease Inhibitor Protein ITIH5 as a Metastasis Suppressor.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2024Review
- Secretion of Sphinganine by Drug-Induced Cancer Cells and Modified Mimetic Sphinganine (MMS) as c-Src Kinase Inhibitor.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Article
- Impact of Altered Body Composition on Clinical and Oncological Outcomes in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Identification and Validation of Potentially Clinically Relevant CpG Regions within the Class 2 Tumor Suppressor GeneCancers · 2023Article
- Promoter hypermethylation of SFRP1 as a prognostic and potentially predictive blood-based biomarker in patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of our proposed concept is to find new target structures for combating cancers with unmet medical needs. This, unfortunately, still applies to the majority of the clinically most relevant tumor entities such as, for example, liver cancer, pancreatic cancer, and many others. Current target structures almost all belong to the class of oncogenic proteins caused by tumor-specific genetic alterations, such as activating mutations, gene fusions, or gene amplifications, often referred to as cancer "driver alterations" or just "drivers." However, restoring the lost function of tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) could also be a valid approach to treating cancer. TSG-derived proteins are usually considered as control systems of cells against oncogenic properties; thus, they represent the brakes in the "car-of-life." Restoring these tumor-defective brakes by gene therapy has not been successful so far, with a few exceptions. It can be assumed that most TSGs are not being inactivated by genetic alteration (class 1 TSGs) but rather by epigenetic silencing (class 2 TSGs or short "C2TSGs"). Reactivation of C2TSGs in cancer therapy is being addressed by the use of DNA demethylating agents and histone deacetylase inhibitors which act on the whole cancer cell genome. These epigenetic therapies have neither been particularly successful, probably because they are "shotgun" approaches that, although acting on C2TSGs, may also reactivate epigenetically silenced oncogenic sequences in the genome. Thus, new strategies are needed to exploit the therapeutic potential of C2TSGs, which have also been named DNA methylation cancer driver genes or "DNAme drivers" recently. Here we present a concept for a new translational and therapeutic approach that focuses on the phenotypic imitation ("mimesis") of proteins encoded by highly disease-relevant C2TSGs/DNAme drivers. Molecular knowledge on C2TSGs is used in two complementary approaches having the translational concept of defining mimetic drugs in common: First, a concept is presented how truncated and/or genetically engineered C2TSG proteins, consisting solely of domains with defined tumor suppressive function can be developed as biologicals. Second, a method is described for identifying small molecules that can mimic the effect of the C2TSG protein lost in the cancer cell. Both approaches should open up a new, previously untapped discovery space for anticancer drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.