Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36139537›Full record

ReviewCancers2022

Lara Bücker, Ulrich Lehmann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Epigenetic Regulation of EMP/EMT-Dependent Fibrosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Mutational landscape of TP53 and CDH1 in gastric cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The Role of EMT-Related lncRNAs in Ovarian Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  19. The Mechanism of DNA Methylation and miRNA in Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  20. Homologous Recombination Abnormalities Associated WithBreast cancer : basic and clinical research · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lara BückerInstitute of Pathology, Medical School Hannover, D-30623 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0432-3611
Ulrich LehmannInstitute of Pathology, Medical School Hannover, D-30623 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2350-6584

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetic inactivation of a tumor suppressor gene by aberrant DNA methylation is a well-established defect in human tumor cells, complementing genetic inactivation by mutation (germline or somatic). In human breast cancer, aberrant gene methylation has diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive potential. A prominent example is the hypermethylation of the

Indexed as

breast cancerCDH1DNA methylationE-cadherininvasive lobular breast cancer (ILBC)

Identifiers

PMID36139537
PMCPMC9497067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.