Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36139515›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

The Effect of Two Interventions to Increase Breast Cancer Screening in Rural Women.

Victoria L Champion, Patrick O Monahan, Timothy E Stump, Erika B Biederman, Eric Vachon, Mira L Katz, Susan M Rawl, Ryan D Baltic, Carla D Kettler, Natalie L Zaborski and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Victoria L ChampionSchool of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6153-0713
Patrick O MonahanIndiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Timothy E StumpIndiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Erika B BiedermanComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University (OSU), Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Eric VachonSchool of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Mira L KatzDivision of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Susan M RawlSchool of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2052-2853
Ryan D BalticComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University (OSU), Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Carla D KettlerIndiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Natalie L ZaborskiComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University (OSU), Columbus, OH 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2494-2866
Electra D PaskettComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University (OSU), Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Indiana University Health · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Jennifer A. Woyach · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
The OSU Center for Clinical and Translational Science: Advancing Today's Discoveries to Improve HealthUL1TR002733 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI RINGEL, MATTHEW D · 2018 to 2022
$28.9M
Unfolded Protein Response and Autophagy in T Helper Cell Effector FunctionP20GM121176 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI Monica Rosas Lemus · 2017 to 2026
$24.9M
Comparative Effectiveness of Interventions to Improve Screening Among Rural WomenR01CA196243 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CHAMPION, VICTORIA LEE, PASKETT, ELECTRA D. · 2015 to 2019
$3.4M
Interdisciplinary Training in Cancer Prevention and ControlT32CA117865 · NCI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Victoria Lee Champion, Catherine E Mosher · 2016 to 2026
$2.4M
Training Program For Cancer Prevention and ControlT32CA229114 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Chyke Abadama Doubeni, Peter G. Shields · 2018 to 2026
$2.0M
Factors Associated with Mailed Return of Self-Sampling for Human Papillomavirus (HPV) TestingF31NR018791 · NINR · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI BIEDERMAN, ERIKA · 2019 to 2021
$67k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002733NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NCI NIH HHS T32 CA117865NCI NIH HHS T32 CA229114NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM121176NIH HHS R01CA196243NIH HHS T32CA117865NIH HHS T32CA229114NINR NIH HHS F31 NR018791NINR NIH HHS F31NR018791
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guideline-based mammography screening is essential to lowering breast cancer mortality, yet women residing in rural areas have lower rates of up to date (UTD) breast cancer screening compared to women in urban areas. We tested the comparative effectiveness of a tailored DVD, and the DVD plus patient navigation (PN) intervention vs. Usual Care (UC) for increasing the percentage of rural women (aged 50 to 74) UTD for breast cancer screening, as part of a larger study. Four hundred and two women who were not UTD for breast cancer screening, eligible, and between the ages of 50 to 74 were recruited from rural counties in Indiana and Ohio. Consented women were randomly assigned to one of three groups after baseline assessment of sociodemographic variables, health status, beliefs related to cancer screening tests, and history of receipt of guideline-based screening. The mean age of participants was 58.2 years with 97% reporting White race. After adjusting for covariates, 54% of women in the combined intervention (DVD + PN) had a mammogram within the 12-month window, over 5 times the rate of becoming UTD compared to UC (OR = 5.11; 95% CI = 2.57, 10.860; p < 0.001). Interactions of the intervention with other variables were not significant. Significant predictors of being UTD included: being in contemplation stage (intending to have a mammogram in the next 6 months), being UTD with other cancer screenings, having more disposable income and receiving a reminder for breast screening. Women who lived in areas with greater Area Deprivation Index scores (a measure of poverty) were less likely to become UTD with breast cancer screening. For rural women who were not UTD with mammography screening, the addition of PN to a tailored DVD significantly improved the uptake of mammography. Attention should be paid to certain groups of women most at risk for not receiving UTD breast screening to improve breast cancer outcomes in rural women.

Indexed as

breast cancer screeningcancer screeninginterventionmammographyrural

Identifiers

PMID36139515
PMCPMC9496655
OpenAlexW4295106724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.