Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36139409›Full record

ArticleCells2022

In Vivo Comparison of Synthetic Macroporous Filamentous and Sponge-like Skin Substitute Matrices Reveals Morphometric Features of the Foreign Body Reaction According to 3D Biomaterial Designs.

Friedrich Barsch, Andreas Mamilos, Volker H Schmitt, Maximilian Babel, Lina Winter, Willi Wagner, Hinrich Winther, Christian Ottomann, Tanja Niedermair, Stephan Schreml and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Friedrich BarschInstitute of Pathology, University Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6189-7259
Andreas MamilosInstitute of Pathology, University Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0895-5675
Volker H SchmittDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Mainz of Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5070-7280
Maximilian BabelInstitute of Pathology, University Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Lina WinterInstitute of Pathology, University Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Willi WagnerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Hinrich WintherInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6283-8042
Christian OttomannCentre for Severe Burns with Plastic Surgery, Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin, 12683 Berlin, Germany.
Tanja NiedermairInstitute of Pathology, University Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Stephan SchremlDepartment of Dermatology, University Medical Centre Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2820-1942
Helmut HierlemannPolyMedics Innovations GmbH, 73770 Denkendorf, Germany.
Christoph BrochhausenInstitute of Pathology, University Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic macroporous biomaterials are widely used in the field of skin tissue engineering to mimic membrane functions of the native dermis. Biomaterial designs can be subclassified with respect to their shape in fibrous designs, namely fibers, meshes or fleeces, respectively, and porous designs, such as sponges and foams. However, synthetic matrices often have limitations regarding unfavorable foreign body responses (FBRs). Severe FBRs can result in unfavorable disintegration and rejection of an implant, whereas mild FBRs can lead to an acceptable integration of a biomaterial. In this context, comparative in vivo studies of different three-dimensional (3D) matrix designs are rare. Especially, the differences regarding FBRs between synthetically derived filamentous fleeces and sponge-like constructs are unknown. In the present study, the FBRs on two 3D matrix designs were explored after 25 days of subcutaneous implantation in a porcine model. Cellular reactions were quantified histopathologically to investigate in which way the FBR is influenced by the biomaterial architecture. Our results show that FBR metrics (polymorph-nucleated cells and fibrotic reactions) were significantly affected according to the matrix designs. Our findings contribute to a better understanding of the 3D matrix tissue interactions and can be useful for future developments of synthetically derived skin substitute biomaterials.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsSkin, ArtificialAnimalsFibrosisForeign-Body ReactionSwineTissue EngineeringBiocompatible Materialsforeign body reactionhistopathologymatrix designskin substitutes

Identifiers

PMID36139409
PMCPMC9496825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.