Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36139249›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Introducing a Puppy to Existing Household Cat(s): Mixed Method Analysis.

Rachel H Kinsman, Sara C Owczarczak-Garstecka, Rachel A Casey, Rosa E P Da Costa, Séverine Tasker, Jane K Murray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rachel H KinsmanDogs Trust, London EC1V 7RQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6931-9189
Sara C Owczarczak-GarsteckaDogs Trust, London EC1V 7RQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5323-8117
Rachel A CaseyDogs Trust, London EC1V 7RQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6559-9531
Rosa E P Da CostaDogs Trust, London EC1V 7RQ, UK.
Séverine TaskerBristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol BA6 8DD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4059-1402
Jane K MurrayDogs Trust, London EC1V 7RQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8525-2877

Funding

Dogs Trust and the Dogs Trust Canine Welfare Grants Committee CWG012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although cats and dogs can live amicably, inter-species conflict can result in poor welfare. Species introduction can impact the development of the cat-dog relationship. This study aimed to identify factors associated with owner reported ‘only desirable’ puppy behaviour (defined as the puppy being uninterested, ignored the cat and/or interacted in a calm way) following introduction to existing household cats, and to explore perceptions of the emerging cat-dog relationship. Owner-reported data collected as part of a longitudinal study of canine health and behaviour were used. Of 4678 puppies, 26.7% lived with at least one cat. Of the 1211 puppies who had been introduced to the household cat at the time of survey completion, playing (58.9%), being overexuberant or over-excited (56.6%), and chasing (48.6%) were the most common behaviours displayed towards cats. ‘Only desirable’ behaviours were shown by 7.3% of puppies. Multivariable logistic regression showed early (puppies aged <12 weeks), gradual introductions and living in a multi-dog household increased the odds of ‘only desirable’ behaviours. Qualitative analysis revealed two styles of introductions—owner-led and pet-led. Owners who led introductions anticipated amicable relationships between pets, whilst owners who let pets introduce themselves did not. Early, gradual, owner-led introductions of puppies to household cats should be encouraged.

Indexed as

behaviourcat behaviourcat-dog interactionscat-dog relationshipscatsdog behaviourdogsintraspecific relationshipspuppy behaviour

Identifiers

PMID36139249
PMCPMC9495027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.