Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36139017›Full record

ArticleBiomolecules2022

Comparative Analyses of Bioactive Compounds in

Rein Drenkhan, Hedi Kaldmäe, Maidu Silm, Kalev Adamson, Uko Bleive, Alar Aluvee, Mart Erik, Ain Raal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomolecules, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Nutrients · 2026
    Article
  2. Green Extraction and Liposomal Encapsulation ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Natural Products and Health Care Functions ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  5. Comparative Study of Chaga (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Evaluation ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Natural Ingredients to Improve Immunity.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rein DrenkhanChair of Silviculture and Forest Ecology, Institute of Forestry and Engineering, Estonian University of Life Sciences, 51006 Tartu, Estonia.
Hedi KaldmäePolli Horticultural Research Centre, Chair of Horticulture, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, 69108 Polli, Estonia.
Maidu SilmChair of Hydrobiology and Fisheries, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, 51006 Tartu, Estonia.
Kalev AdamsonChair of Silviculture and Forest Ecology, Institute of Forestry and Engineering, Estonian University of Life Sciences, 51006 Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0002-8810-8838
Uko BleivePolli Horticultural Research Centre, Chair of Horticulture, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, 69108 Polli, Estonia.
Alar AluveePolli Horticultural Research Centre, Chair of Horticulture, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, 69108 Polli, Estonia.
Mart ErikInopure OÜ, 51010 Tartu, Estonia.
Ain RaalFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Pharmacy, University of Tartu, 50411 Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0001-8731-7366

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inonotus obliquus grows in the Northern Hemisphere on some living broadleaved tree species as a pathogen, causing stem rot. In Estonia, the fungus is well known in the Betula species but can also be found on Alnus. Sterile conks of I. obliquus contain different bioactive compounds, but the quantitative and comparative research of these compounds in conks on different host species is limited. In the current work, I. obliquus was isolated and, evidently, determined from Alnus incana (L.) Moench., Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn., and Betula pendula Roth, and the content of bioactive compounds in conks on these hosts were analysed. All the analysed conks sampled from A. incana and B. pendula contained betulin that varied from 111 to 159 µg/g. A significantly (p < 0.05) higher betulinic acid content was found in conks sampled from A. incana when compared with B. pendula: 474−635 and 20−132 µg/g, respectively. However, the conks from Betula were richer in total polyphenols, flavonols, and glucans. The content of inotodiol was quite similar in the conks from A. incana (7455−8961 µg/g) and B. pendula (7881−9057 µg/g). Also, no significant differences in the lanosterol content were found between the samples from these two tree species. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first investigation of the chemical composition of I. obliquus parasitizing on Alnus. The results demonstrate that the bioactive compounds are promising in conks of I. obliquus growing not only on Betula but also on the Alnus species. It supports the opportunity to cultivate I. obliquus, also on the Alnus species, thus increasing the economic value of growing this tree species in forestry.

Indexed as

AlnusBetulaFlavonolsGlucansInonotusLanosterolFlavonolsGlucansLanosterolAlnus glutinosaAlnus incanaBetula pendulabetulinbetulinic acidinotodiollanosterolα- and β-glucan

Identifiers

PMID36139017
PMCPMC9496626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.