Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36139012›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2022

Nicotinamide

Valentina Pozzi, Roberto Campagna, Davide Sartini, Monica Emanuelli

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The Sirtuin Network: Linking NADDiabetes/metabolism research and reviews · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Advances in radiotherapy in the treatment of esophageal cancer.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025
    Article
  9. Preeclampsia as a Study Model for Aging: The Klotho Gene Paradigm.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Gastric Cancer in the Era of Epigenetics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. Inhibitors of NADInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Valentina PozziDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60020 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3941-0341
Roberto CampagnaDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60020 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2607-2734
Davide SartiniDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60020 Ancona, Italy.
Monica EmanuelliDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60020 Ancona, Italy.
Marche Polytechnic University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastrointestinal (GI) neoplasms include esophageal, gastric, colorectal, hepatic, and pancreatic cancers. They are characterized by asymptomatic behavior, being responsible for diagnostic delay. Substantial refractoriness to chemo- and radiotherapy, exhibited by late-stage tumors, contribute to determine poor patient outcome. Therefore, it is of outmost importance to identify new molecular targets for the development of effective therapeutic strategies. In this study, we focused on the enzyme nicotinamide

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal NeoplasmsNicotinamide N-MethyltransferaseDelayed DiagnosisHumansNiacinamideNitrosaminesTyramineNiacinamideNicotinamide N-MethyltransferaseNitrosaminesN-nitroso-N-methyltyramineTyraminecolorectal canceresophageal cancergastric cancerhepatic cancermolecular biomarkernicotinamide N-methyltransferasepancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID36139012
PMCPMC9496617
OpenAlexW4293008166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.