Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36138956›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2022

Assessing Multi-Site rs-fMRI-Based Connectomic Harmonization Using Information Theory.

Facundo Roffet, Claudio Delrieux, Gustavo Patow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Disrupted Brain Hierarchical Organization in Alzheimer's Disease Progression.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Facundo RoffetDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering (DIEC), Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca AR-B8000, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-7788-4612
Claudio DelrieuxDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering (DIEC), Universidad Nacional del Sur and National Council for Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET), Bahía Blanca AR-B8000, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-2727-8374
Gustavo PatowViRVIG, University of Girona, 17003 Girona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1977-9101

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several harmonization techniques have recently been proposed for connectomics/networks derived from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) acquired at multiple sites. These techniques have the objective of mitigating site-specific biases that complicate its subsequent analysis and, therefore, compromise the quality of the results when these images are analyzed together. Thus, harmonization is indispensable when large cohorts are required in which the data obtained must be independent of the particular condition of each resonator, its make and model, its calibration, and other features or artifacts that may affect the significance of the acquisition. To date, no assessment of the actual efficacy of these harmonization techniques has been proposed. In this work, we apply recently introduced Information Theory tools to analyze the effectiveness of these techniques, developing a methodology that allows us to compare different harmonization models. We demonstrate the usefulness of this methodology by applying it to some of the most widespread harmonization frameworks and datasets. As a result, we are able to show that some of these techniques are indeed ineffective since the acquisition site can still be determined from the fMRI data after the processing.

Indexed as

harmonizationinformation theorymulti-site acquisitionneurosciencers-fMRI

Identifiers

PMID36138956
PMCPMC9496818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.