Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36138947›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2022

Does Non-Immersive Virtual Reality Improve Attention Processes in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury? Encouraging Data from a Pilot Study.

Rosaria De Luca, Mirjam Bonanno, Carmela Rifici, Patrizia Pollicino, Angelo Caminiti, Giovanni Morone, Rocco Salvatore Calabrò

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06291532 (Feasibility and Usability of a Virtual Reality System to Improve Standardized Rehabilitation in Patients With Moderate Intellectual Disability and Severe Autism Spectrum Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06291532 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility and Usability of a Virtual Reality System to Improve Standardized Rehabilitation in Patients With Moderate Intellectual Disability and Severe Autism Spectrum Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino PulejoRan2023 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsAutism Spectrum Disorder, Intellectual DisabilityArmsRehabilitation with VRRS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The Effect of Traumatic Brain Injury on Memory.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rosaria De LucaNeurorehabilitation Unit, IRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino Pulejo, 98124 Messina, Italy.
Mirjam BonannoNeurorehabilitation Unit, IRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino Pulejo, 98124 Messina, Italy.
Carmela RificiNeurorehabilitation Unit, IRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino Pulejo, 98124 Messina, Italy.
Patrizia PollicinoNeurorehabilitation Unit, IRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino Pulejo, 98124 Messina, Italy.
Angelo CaminitiNeurorehabilitation Unit, IRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino Pulejo, 98124 Messina, Italy.
Giovanni MoroneDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3602-4197
Rocco Salvatore CalabròNeurorehabilitation Unit, IRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino Pulejo, 98124 Messina, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a sudden injury that causes damage to the brain. Rehabilitation therapies include specific training, such as attention process training (APT) programs using either standard or innovative approaches. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of a non-immersive virtual reality-based attention training to stimulate attention processes and mood in TBI patients. Thirty subjects with TBI were enrolled at the Neurorehabilitation Unit of the IRCCS Neurolesi Center and divided into either the Conventional Attention Process Training Group (C_APT: n = 15) or the Virtual-Based Attention Processes Training Group (VB_APT: n = 15), treated with the Virtual Reality Rehabilitation System (VRRS-Evo). All of the patients were evaluated with a specific psychometric battery before (T0) and after the end (T1) of each program. We found statistically significant differences between the two groups, in particular concerning global cognitive status (p < 0.02), attention processes (p < 0.03), depression symptoms (p < 0.04) and visual attention (p < 0.01). Experimental intragroup analysis showed great statistical significances in all psychometric tests, i.e., the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (p < 0.0006), Attention Matrices (p < 0.0007), the Hamilton Rating Scale-Depression (p < 0.004), the Trail Making Test-A (p < 0.0007), the Trail Making Test-B (p < 0.0007), and the Trail Making test-BA (p < 0.007). Our results suggest that non-immersive virtual reality may be a useful and effective approach for the attention processes recovery and mood of TBI patients, leading to better cognitive and behavioral outcomes.

Indexed as

attention process trainingtraumatic brain injuryvirtual-based cognitive rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID36138947
PMCPMC9496665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.